Parliament ke yeh power hai constitution ka interpretation karna, lekin yeh koi jhooth interpretation nahin ho sakti. Agar Parliament ek law enact karta hai jo Constitution se virodhi hai, toh use hi ultra vires kiya ja sakta hai. Supreme C

Bhai, sorry to clarify, but yeh case to sahi se samjhna hi padega. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) main Supreme Court ne Constitution Amendment Act, 1971 ko validate kiya, lekin woh Constitution ko 'basic structure' par hi sak

Yeh doctrine ka jhagda hai, par sabse pehle samajhne ke liye aapko pehle inki vyakhya karne ki zaroorat hai. Yeh ek jaruri baat hai. Jaise ki aapke teacher ya book kehte hain, tabhi aap unki sachai samjh sakte hain. Sabse pehle aap do theor

Section 54 of the Indian Contract Act is indeed a colonial relic. It deals with the 'law of consideration' in contract agreements. In today's scenario, courts have broadened its scope, making it more relevant. However, the law still holds m

Sir, CPC mein traffic challans kaa koi connection nahi hai, but traffic rules and regulations ke liye CPC aur MV Act dono important hain. CPC traffic accidents ke cases ke liye apply hota hai. Traffic challans MV Act ke under hote hain. So,

Maine socha hai, sir, aapka point wrong hai! Agar ek contract mein express term nahi hai, toh bas implied term hi nahi hoti. Implied term to sirf express term ka extension hai, jiska matlab yeh hai ki jhootha nahi hua hai. Maine apne notes

Bhai, maine pehle se hi isse likhna tha. The Admissibility battle hai jo hamesha ladta rehta hai. BSA (Best Evidence Rule) vs Evidence Act, yeh dono hi aapka saath dene ki koshish karte hain. Par main hoon aisa mat manna ki Evidence Act ko

Arre yaar, 'Battle of Forms' toh ek bahut hi vishal issue hai! Jo party pehle contract ka form submit karegi, uska claim valid rahega. Lekin agar dusri party ka form different hoga, toh kya hoga? Unka claim valid nahi hoga. Supreme Court ne