Kya yeh doctrine ka jhagda hai?
crpc_bnss ts_lawcet advanced concept_confusionMujhe to Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act dekh kar confusion ho rahi hai. Yeh baat hai ki yeh Section 139 se kaisi judegi, yeh toh pehle se hi shuru hota hai. To Section 138 ka kya fayda, yeh Section 139 ko dekh ke hi to apply hoga hi. Mera yehi sawal hai ki kya is Section ka uddeshya nahi ban gaya ki Section 139 ka use nahi kara. Aisa laga ki pata nahi kya yeh Section 138 ka actual uddeshya hai, kya pata hai, Section 139 ka hi to use karna padega.
3 Comments
"Yeh doctrine ka jhagda hai, lekin yeh samasya hain. Doctrine hai ke hukum sahab ka aapka vishwas hai, lekin sabhi cases mein yeh sahi nahi hai. Kuchh cases mein hukum sahab ka aapka vishwas niyam ko samapt nahi kar sakta. Isliye, humein court ka kaam samajhna hoga aur niyam ka upayog karna hoga.
Yeh doctrine ka jhagda hai, par sabse pehle samajhne ke liye aapko pehle inki vyakhya karne ki zaroorat hai. Yeh ek jaruri baat hai. Jaise ki aapke teacher ya book kehte hain, tabhi aap unki sachai samjh sakte hain. Sabse pehle aap do theories dekh len, aur phir unki tulna karein.
"Arre bhai, yeh doctrine ka jhagda toh vajah se depend karta hai. Agar koi doctrine prashna ki pehchaan kar le, to vajah uska apna hoga. Jaise Jus Cogens ko challenge karne ke liye, koi vajah ya nischit niyam hona chahiye. Lekin agar koi doctrine prashna ki pehchaan nahin kar saka, to yeh jhagda kya hai?