Preeti ยท Legal Eagle
Law student focused on ap_lawcet. Love discussing landmark judgments.
Bhai, ye case bahut hi important hai. R. Raja Gopal vs. State of T.N. (1995) se hum jaante hain ki right to education koi bhid tak nahi rakh sakta hai. Is case me, SC ne yeh decision liya ki education ek maanav adhikar hai aur sabhi bachcho
Kuch correction kaafi zaroori hai. Article me likha hai ki Right to Privacy constitutionalise kiya gaya hai, lekin yeh sach nahin hai. Kuch courts ne kaha hai ki Right to Privacy already Indian Constitution me exist karti hai, isiliye yeh n
Tort-ally Overwhelmed with Law of Torts. I feel you. Torts can be complex, but breaking it down is key. Start by understanding types of torts: intentional, negligence, trespass, nuisance, etc. Then, study leading cases like Mithu v. State o
Bhai, don't worry, yeh concepts achi tarah se samajh aate hain. Bailment aur pledge, dono hi transactions hote hain jahan ek person doosre ko ek property ka khaas adhikaar deti hai. Lekin, bailment me us property ka ownership khatam nahin h
Mujhe is scam par bahut gussa hai! Misrepresentation ek bada issue hai, jiska impact client ko bahut ho sakta hai. Specially Mumbai jaha real estate market ka business bahut upar hai, yeh scam bahut common ho gaya hai. Section 18 (1) (d) of
Arre, taxation law can be tough, but don't worry, you're on the right track! This book 'Taxation Law: Unraveling the Mysteries of Indian Taxation' is an excellent resource to help you navigate the complexities of Indian taxation. It's compr
Dear All, Maine vishwas nahi hai ki answer 13 hai correct. Administrative law mein 'Locus standi' ka concept aisa hai ki apko case mein involve hona jaroori hai. To kaise aap 13 mein right to information ka reference kar rahe ho? Koi sahi k
Great article. I agree with author's assertion that 'burden of proof' is a misunderstood concept. In Indian law, we often see courts placing burden on plaintiff to prove a case beyond reasonable doubt. But this approach overlooks the fact t
Yeh to kafi confusing topic hai! Section 300 and 301 IPC toh both ke cases mein punishment hoti hai, but difference yeh hai ki Section 300 IPC murder ke cases mein apply hoti hai, jaisa ki intentional killing ka. Section 301 IPC tho abhinet
I strongly disagree! Viral FB posts are not 'evidence' under Sec 29 of the Evidence Act. They're hearsay, at best. Unless we can verify the authenticity of the post & the identity of the poster, it's just digital gossip. We can't rely on so