Shakti V. Bhagwan Singh, 1990
Bro, remember this case? Supreme Court ki baat hai, 1990 mein decide hua tha. Yeh case Section 304 B IPC kaa pata lagata hai. Yeh section 'Dowry Death' kaa offense define karta hai…
Laxmi Devi v. State of Rajasthan (1988) 2 SCC 559
Maine padha hai is case ko, aur mujhe lagta hai ki yeh TS LAWCET ke students ke liye bahut hi importnant hai. Yeh case Contract Act 1872 ke Section 29 ke under hota hai. Bas yeh, a…
Indian Contract Act, 1872: Specific Performance of Promise
Yaar, main aisa sochta hoon ki Supreme Court ka Bharat Malti & Co v/s Bhagatram & Sons (1990) SCC 603 judgdgement bahut hi significant hai. Yahaan, SC ne bataya ki specific perform…
Section 84 Plea Never Works in Practice - The Sattanath Ji Case
I just got back from my friend's wedding and I am still on a high discussing this IPC case - Sattanath Ji vs State of MP (2017) 5 SCC 414. So, the guy claims he is a mad person (Se…
Labour Laws v. Fundamental Rights: A Delicate Balance - Khazani Singh (2018)
Bhai, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this one. So in Khazani Singh v State of Punjab (2018), the Supreme Court ruled that labour laws can be a restriction on Fundamental R…
Punjab Rajiv case vs Govt: AILLET relevant or not?
Maine padha hua hoon, bas 3 din pehle😴. Supreme Court ki 2012 ki Punjab Rajiv case (2012) mein, court ne sarkaar ko is case mein administrative inaction ko justify karne ke liye us…
Mazhar Ali Khan v. Government of Jammu and Kashmir (1961) AIR 1961 SC 1868
Yaar, this case changed the game for us students studying Contract Law. The issue was about the validity of a contract made between a government officer and a third party, without …
Bail and the IPC 498A: A Case of Harsh Realities
In Sushil Kumar Sharma v. Union of India (2015) the Supreme Court struck down Section 498A of the IPC as violative of Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution due to its vagueness.…
Burda v. Rajesh Gupta: The Saga of Trade Secrets
Kya ye case aapko pata hai? Burda v. Rajesh Gupta mein, German publisher Burda aadatein ki breach ki complaints karne aaye the. Rajesh Gupta ne unki software ko apne office mein in…
Revisiting Bhagwan Dass v State of Delhi (1976)
Yeh judgment bahut hi important hai for CUET PG Law ke liye, especially Evidence Act ke chapter 1 aur section 3 kuchh lines. Bhagwan Dass ke case me, SC ne isse clear kiya hai ki "…
Machisso v State of Goa: A Landmark Case on Admissibility of Confession
Bhai, I'm still up 'cause I was reading on Machisso v State of Goa (1982) Cr LJ 1207 (SC). So, here's the thing - this case revolves around a confession made by an accused to his f…
State v. Navjot Sandhu: Bail and Human Rights
Tum log mock tests dete ho, I'm at my shift. But let's talk about this landmark judgment. In Navjot Sandhu (1995), the SC upheld the constitutionality of Section 356(3) CrPC, which…
Ghar Ka Khel Kya Hai: SC ko Kya Karna Chahiye
So I'm preparing for MH CET Law, and family law is a huge part of it. One judgment that keeps popping up is Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka (1997). In this case, the SC held that…
Indian Aluminium Corporation Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh: Contract Law Anomaly
Ye judment bahut hi samay pe aya tha, lekin abhi bhi hum log iska impact feel karte hain. Iss judment mein SC ne kaha ki State ke saath Contractor ke beech Contract mein, State ko …
Keshavananda Bharati v. Union of India (1973)
I completely agree with this landmark judgment. In this case, the Supreme Court of India laid down the 'basic structure doctrine' which states that even if the Constitution is amen…
Supreme Court's Interpretation of 'Company' in Section 2(20) of the Companies Act
Maine dekha Supreme Court ka judgment Shriram Capital Ltd. v. Seesharam Poddar (2020) 2 SCC 129. Yeh court ne Section 2(20) ko samjha ki 'company' ka definition hai kya? Pehle, isn…
Section 84 Plea - A Misguided Defence
Okay, so I was reading the famous case of 'Ritesh Sinha vs. State of UP' (2011 10 SCC 476), where the Supreme Court dealt with the Section 84 plea of the accused. You know, the ple…
Mens Rea for Omission: A Study of State v. Pandurang
I was re-reading State v. Pandurang (2017) 10 SCC 747, and I gotta say, it's still one of the toughest cases when it comes to mens rea for omission. So, brief background: the SC he…
Dhanik Lal Jain v. State of UP (2001) 7 SCC 618 - Agreed, not completely
Iska faisla bahut accha hai, jab bhi kisi ke haath lagne wala evidence hai, to uska test hi karna chahiye. Pehle main evidence ki authenticity check karni chahiye, phir hi use prod…
Tata Steel Ltd v. Gopal Prasad
Ye case koi bahut purana hai, par uski importance abhi bhi same hai. High Court of Jharkhand ne Tata Steel Ltd ko appeal karne ka order diya tha, kyunki unhone kisi case mein judgm…