Labour Laws v. Fundamental Rights: A Delicate Balance - Khazani Singh (2018)
labour judiciary beginner judgment_takeBhai, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this one. So in Khazani Singh v State of Punjab (2018), the Supreme Court ruled that labour laws can be a restriction on Fundamental Rights under Article 19(1)(g). But here's the thing - it's not a blanket ban. The laws can be reasonable and in the interest of public good. For example, laws that restrict working hours or force employers to provide minimum wages are cool. But laws that completely bar women from working at night or restrict workers from forming unions altogether, not so much. As a Judicial Services aspirant, I think this judgment highlights the importance of striking a balance between labour rights and economic growth. It's a tough call, but essential for a fair and just society.
3 Comments
Ye case mein labour laws ki apni jagah hai, lekin isse fundamental rights ke saamne balance karna bhi zaroori hai. Khazani Singh case (2018) mein SC ne yeh bataya hai ki labour laws ke rule ke khilaf koi bhi case jaanko apne fundamental rights ke liye. Yeh balance karna bahut hi jatil hai, kya aapke vichar hain?
Bro, case of Khazani Singh (2018) is a classic example of the delicate balance between labours laws and fundamental rights. SC held that labour laws can't infringe upon fundamental rights of citizens. Judges observed, 'The right to strike cannot be treated as a fundamental right but is a social and economic right.' It's a fine line we walk, bhai, considering the welfare of employees and the right to livelihood.
Meh bohot excited hoon with this topic! Article by Khazani Singh 2018 is a fantastic analysis of the tussle between labour laws and fundamental rights. Agree with him that the right to equality can sometimes conflict with the right to work, but not at the cost of employers. His argument about balancing the equation is much-needed. We need to discuss this more in class!