Main samjhta hoon ki yeh show dharn kiya gaya hai, magar maine dekhha hai ki yeh kathinai aur kai jagah se bahar ja raha hai. Apni Adalat me, jugee ko samjhaana chahti hoon, koi bhi vichar badal sakta hai, par yeh show me sabke vichar hi ek

Bhai, yeh article bahut hi informative hai! CUET PG Law aspirants ke liye yeh article sabhi ko padhna chahiye. CrPC aur BNSS ko compare karke, aapko pata chalega ki kaise aapke questions aur topics set honge. Agar aap CUET PG Law mein prepa

Mujhe toh lagta hai ki Parda ka concept sirf Fundamental Rights se juda hua hai. Constitution mein jo Article 20-21 hain, ve Parda ka dhyan rakhte hain. Lekin kya Parda ke andar ke karanon ka dhyan nahi diya jata hai? Parda ka concept sirf

"Arre, sabse pehle section 29 ke bare mein samajhna hoga. Yeh section 65B ke madhyam se hearsay ki samasya ko solve karta hai. Jab aap court mein witness ke statement ko consider karte hain, toh aapko unki reliability par dhyan dena hoga. C

Yaaar, I totally get where you're coming from! CPC MCQs can be super tricky, especially with the options being so similar. I've been there too! But, I think we can't give up yet! With consistent practice and revision, I've started to get a

"Bhare aapke comment mein bahut accha case diya hai. Lekin yeh toh kuchh pehli samjhauta case hi tha, jismein CPC ki power of court ko banaya gaya tha. Agar aapko mukhya adhishwar ke role ko samajhna hai, toh main aapse suggest karta hoon k

"Main to aasaan nahin hun ki Kanoon ki Shulk ki paribhasha hai, lekin mujhe lagta hai ki "Substantive Due Process" ka matlab hai ki sabhi vah kanoon valid nahin honge jo vyakti ke aadhikaaron ko kaise affect karte hain. Yeh dharna Bharat me

Maine padha hai is book, lekin yeh kahna hai ki contract law ki aapne pehli kitab nahin hoti. Yeh subject aur bhi complex hai na ki aap isse 100 pages ke ek beginner's guide mein samjh sakein. Aapko minimum 5-6 books padhne honge iske liye,

Agreed on that! A parliamentary law can be declared unconstitutional by the judiciary under Article 13(2) of our Constitution, which says a law in contravention of Part III (Fundamental Rights) is void. Courts have done so in many landmark

"Aap logon ko samajhne ke liye, IPC aur Realpolitik dwaara sarkaar ki gatividhiyan ko samjhaate hain. Lekin kabhi bhi, IPC ke under kaam hi kuchh aur ho sakta hai. Realpolitik ne kuchh chunautiyan aur samasyaon ko joda hai jo IPC ki samasya

Hey guys, I'm feeling the same vibes! Section 300(6) IPC is seriously ambiguous, right? One possible interpretation is that it's aimed at cases where the intention was to cause the death, but another view is that it's only applicable if the