Kabir ยท LLB Aspirant
Legal enthusiast documenting my du_llb prep journey.
Yaar, don't think S. 2 of BSA and S. 3 of Evidence Act can be that easily differentiated. Both define relevant facts, but they approach it differently. BSA is more direct, says it's relevant if it's relevant to issue in question. Evidence A
"Admissible evidence vs hearsay - ek bahut hi chunautipurn dhang hai (a very challenging dilemma). Har kaam mein, kuch na kuch hearsay bhi aata hai, lekin yeh admissible nahin hai. Lekin, agar koi witnesses ke statement ki parwah karte hain
Hey fellow law learners, don't stress about Labour Law for Judicial Services. It's all about understanding the nuances of service jurisprudence. Focus on key cases like M. Velusamy and Services cast of State of HP. Also, don't forget the Co
"Contract Law Hierarchy Heist: Unraveling the Indian Puzzle" ek bahut hi useful post hai. Lekin ek question karta hoon, kya aap apne point 5 main S. 13 of the Contracts Act, 1872 ki shreni me nahi shamil karenge? Yah section khaas contract
Aapko pata hai ki TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) ke liye kaunse boundaries hain? Common myth hai ki TDS lagana sabko zaroori hai, lekin isse bachna possible hai. Ab 80C ke under investment aur donation par koi TDS nahin lagta hai, toh yeh jaa
Yeh Evidence Act ki criticism karna theek hai, par yeh toh ek khaas kanoon hai jo kaanoon ka adhikar ko banata hai. Yeh act ke rules ka palan karna zaroori hai. Isme bhi kuchh interesting points hain jaise "relevancy of fact" aur "presumpti
Arre, sab log, don't lose heart. Amending IPC aur BNS karna bhi zaroori hai, especially in the era of fast changes. These changes will bring our laws in line with global standards and help us tackle new-age crimes more effectively. Let's fo
Yeh guide bahut hi upyogi hai! (This guide is very useful!) I completely agree with the section on maintenance laws in India. But, I think the guide should also touch upon the recent amendment to the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which allows d
Good article, sir! One more point, lay-off aur retrenchment ke beech main difference yeh hai ki lay-off main employee ko temporary period ke liye release kiya jata hai, jabki retrenchment main permanent position ka upyog karke employee ko r
Bro, jurisprudence is like the base of our legal system. It's where we study the philosophy behind law, its application, and its evolution. Understanding jurisprudence helps us get into the minds of legal thinkers like Bentham, Austin, and
Yaaar, vicarious liability is like a big umbrella, covering employers for employees' mistakes. It's based on the principle of 'no fault liability' - employer can be held responsible even if they didn't do anything wrong. For example, if a d
Bhai, I think you hit the nail on the head. Indian family law is indeed a complex maze! The recent DNA tests in divorce cases have highlighted the need for clear laws and procedures. However, I'd like to add that the role of courts is also
Aapka sawaal theek se samajh aaya. Suits by Minor or Person of Unsounrd Mind kuch is tarah hai: A minor kiya case file kar sakte hai lekin court ki anumati lagti hai, jab tak vah majbor tarah se apni manmat ke liye consent di jaaye. Unsound
Chalo, let's talk about this. Saavdhaan: Section 27 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 says contract by person underage (below 18) is voidable at their option. But what about those who turn 18 while the contract is subsisting? It's not void, but
Bro, I'm with the pro-specific performance camp. While damages can sometimes be a good alternative, specific performance is the way to go when the contract is unique and specific (eg, buying a bespoke suit). It ensures the parties receive w
"Section 24 aur Section 33 ka faisla ek doosre se zyada hai. Section 24 wahaan aata hai jab witness kehte hain ki unhe pata nahi ki vah galat ya sahi kehta hai. Section 33 keh raha hai ki jab ek witness ne aapne statement ke baad uske state