"Yeh to sach hai ki vicarious liability ka concept badaaam hai. Jab koi employee apne boss ke actions ke liye responsible hota hai, to yah kai baar court mein samne aata hai. Lekin, kya yeh theek hai? Kya baap/maa/parivaar ki vicarious liab

Bhai, ye toh koi confusion hi hai! Section 46 CrPC ke 2 parts hain - 1st part (sub-section 1) mein, police can enter a premise without warrant if a person refuses to open the door & 2nd part (sub-section 2) mein, it says 2 or more police of

Meh, ek problem hai yeh! You think Basic Structure Doctrine is difficult because you're not getting the context right. It's not just about a few landmark judgments. It's about understanding the fundamental principles of Constitution-making.

Bhaiyya, apne topic ko aur depth me le jana chahta hoon, law of torts toh kuch isse kuch nahi. Kya aapke paas koi aisi example hai jahaan strict liability ka use hua hai? Maine pehle socha ki yeh concept kuch limited hai, lekin ab janta hu

Sarpech ban jaata hai jab koi shakyaat hoti hai, toh Section 174 koi investigation nahi hai, sirf mere pas kuch incident aaya tha, aur main uska police report likhaaunga. Investigation ke baad, agar koi shakyaat hai tab hi chargeframe kiya

Ab Section 94 of Companies Act 2013 ka focus hai liquidator ki immunity pe. Lekin mujhe lagta hai yeh outdated hai. Liquidators ab aur bhi responsible role nahi karte, unki immunity bhi is baat ka jawab hai. Unhe court ke faisle ka pura pur

"Arre bhai, yeh problem to hamesha se hi hai. Lekin humne abhi bhi jeevan me kuch naya karke dekhna hai. Me too haan, meri behen aur meheeri ke marriage me bhavishya ke laws ke dauraan sawal thode aasani hote hain.

"Hey guys, meri toh baat yeh hai, CPC se humein pata hai ki mock test ka darr sirf hawa hai. Yeh koi real exam nahi hai, yeh practice hai, aur humein practice se hi mehsoos hota hai ki humaray answers kaisay aayeinge. Aur maine toh suna hai

Mujhe lagta hai ki aap ki discussion bahut hi akankshit hai. Bilateral contracts ko lekar sahi jaankari dekhne se pata chalta hai ki ve na hi hamesha blessings hote hain aur na hi hamesha curses. Kuchh mukaat ke baavjood, in contracts ka ma

Additional Info: In re: Telangana Govt. vs. Google kya, Section 11 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 ka reference hai. Is Section ki shuruaati sabhi case mein apply hone wali hai, however, Tribunal's jurisdiction ka scope different

Yeh dono sections toh aisa hain jaise ek hi family se hain. Sabse bada difference toh Section 124 hai jo sedition ke liye hai aur Section 125 jo maintenence ke liye hai. Section 124 ka kaha jata hai ki woh kisi vyakti ko gaddar ke khilaaf k

Ye 498A ka topic to kafi vishay hai, yaar. Ek baar iska use karke khud ko khada karna mushkil ho sakta hai. Section ko apply karne ke liye saabit karna padta hai ki shadi ke baad paribarik samuh ne kisi tarah ka sharmatsalvad ya anuchit vai

Maine to bhi samajh nahi aaya hai section 60 ke baare me! It's like, CPC me kuch kaisa hi lagta hai aur fir bhi hum unhein yaad karne ke liye kai pagal batayein hote hain. Agree karta hoon, yeh section bahut zyada complex hai aur students k