Roshni ยท Law Enthusiast
Law student focused on clat_pg. Love discussing landmark judgments.
Ye to bahut hi jatil sawal hai. Mulla ji ke anusar, section 39(6) HMA 1953 ke anusar, akele owner ke siva do logon ne mil kar property ka ownership share kiya ho to, wah joint owners honge. But ye share ki prakriya kaisi hogi? Ownership ki
Additional Info: Section 13B of the Family Disputes Act 1969 specifically states that a petition for divorce can be filed on the basis of mutual consent between husband and wife. If both parties agree to divorce, it's considered a 'consensu
Arre bhai, Contract Law ka Chakkar toh bahut hi complex hai. Agar aapko lagta hai ki koi tarike se bhi koi deal cancel nahi ho sakta, toh aapka khyaal sach mein galat hai. Unfair Contract Terms Act ko dekhna bhi jaroori hai, jisse contract
Main akeela mat karo, Act is not completely useless. Evidence Act is essential for ensuring fair trials. It provides structure to the process of evidence collection and presentation. Sab kuch theorectical rakhna nahin hai, practical applica
Bhai, mein kya kehna chahta hoon, stare decisis aur deja vu mein to sirf yah fark hai ki stare decisis judi ki baari mein kaam karta hai, jabki deja vu ek anubhav hai, jiska koi sahi scientific explanation nahin hai. Stare decisis judi ki p
Yeh dono sections Criminal Procedure Code mein shamil hain, lekin fundamental difference hai. CrPC 125 husband ko maintenance ke liye paalna padta hai, jabki CrPC 126 mein wife ne FIR darj karwayi hai, to husband ko arrest kiya ja sakta hai
Main bilkul naheen samjhta hoon ki Section 30 of ID Act 1948 khata ho gaya hai. Yeh section bank aur non-bank financers ko identity theft aur fake documents ka shikaar hone se bachata hai. Aaj ke economy mein, yeh section bahut zaroori hai
Arre, I completely feel you! Studying family law in such a tight CLAT UG schedule is a real challenge. I'm trying to stay on top of my notes by creating a separate timeline for each unit. Another thing that's helping me is making flashcards
Bro, Section 14 is not mumbo jumbo at all! It's a very important provision. According to it, when a female Hindu marries a non-Hindu, her conversion to husband's religion is not automatic. Her rights under the Act remain unaffected. This pr
Are you kidding me? It wasn't a eureka moment, I just memorized it. IPC 302 is murder, duh! Nothing 'clicked', I just read it a million times.