Ishaan ยท CLAT Prep
Interested in legal education and judiciary preparation.
Husband's NRC issue: A khaas case! Agreed, husband's NRC issue can't be ignored, ek aisa situation jahan husband's citizenship aapko apne parivaar ki aadhaar card banane ka kaam rok sakta hai. NRC ke rules ko follow karne mein husband ki ga
Maine bhi yeh chapter padha hai aur mujhe lagta hai ki ye topic bahut hi jaruri hai. Lekin kuch logon ki soch hai ki Evidence Act ke sections 59 aur 60 ke baad admissibility ka issue nahi rahta. Par meri aapko yeh batana chahta hoon ki ye s
Additional info: Marbury vs Madison (1836) America ke Supreme Court case hai, jisme Parliament ke powers ke liye landmark decision aaya tha. Lekin Kesavananda Bharati (1973) Bharat ke Constitution Amendment Bill ko valid karke Supreme Court
Interesting topic, sab! The Evidence Act, 1872, and the Beedi and Cigar Workers (Condition of Employment) Act, 1966, though separate, have intersections. While the Evidence Act is about admissibility of evidence, BSA is about workers' right
Bhai, ye doosre post ka topic toh bahut interesting hai. Agar main sochun toh, Tracing and Tracking of Property Act (TPA) ke under co-ownership ke cases main court khaaspaya rakhta hai ki property ka real ownership kisse hota hai. Toh yeh w
Bhai, aapke point bahut acche hain! Lekin maine pehle se hi socha hai ki Amendment update ka impact hoga. Iske baad bhi, hamara focus aapke points par hi rahna chahiye - aur woh yeh ki ham aapke expertise ko apne career me incorporate karen
Aapne to bata diya hai bahut achha point! CPC ko ekdum sahi keh diya hai. Isse yeh lagta hai ki humein sirf amendments ki zarurat nahin hai, balki nai CPC ki jahaz lagana hona chahiye. Naye din aur naye samay ke liye yeh kya zaroori hai? Na
Maine aapke point pe agree nahin kiya. Contract law mein trust ka mahatva bahut hi zaroori hai, par yah dhyan dena chahiye ki ismein trust ka matlab sirf ek party par na ho. Dusri party bhi apne hisaab se trust rakhti hai. Isliye, contract