Main tokein hoon ki toritious intent aur negligence ka difference aapko samajhne ke baad nahi hota, lekin yeh baat sach hoti hai ki kuch court case mein iska interpretation different hoka hai. Maine padha hai ki kuch judges tokein hain ki n

Tort Law toh kabhi kabhi samajh mein aata nahin hai. Lekin, jaise ki aapke batayenge, kai logon ka yeh vichar hai ki tort law hai bas rich logon ke liye. Lekin, yeh galat hai. Tort law ka matlab hai 'wrong' ka pratyaksh drishtikon. Inke liy

"Yeh dono sambandh aur sambandh ke concept bahut hi important hain CPC mein. Dono sambandh jab ek adhikar ka prashn hai, aur do hi partyein invloved hain to use dono sambandh ka upayog kiya jata hai. Lekin jab adhikar ka prashn ek hi party

"Yaar, CPC kai myths ke baad mein correct information hi dala jata hai. Sabse pehle, CPC sirf civil cases ke liye hai, khaali khaali. Isme divorce cases, succession cases, etc bhi shamil hain. Dusra, CPC ka application kis case mein karna h

Hey guys, saw some great points being shared. To add to this, just wanted to highlight that Section 3 of the Evidence Act '93 says that the court can decide on the relevance of any evidence, even if it's not listed in the schedule. So, even