Warisha ยท Bar Exam Prep
Final year LLB student. judiciary aspirant.
Bhai, Section 56(2)(viib) ka matlab hai ki koi bhi company jo 500 crore se zyada ke share capital se jude huye hai, unhein khud ko "domestic company" ka status dena hoga. Ye section Budget 2013 mein introduce hua tha aur unhi company ke liy
Buddy, I feel you! CUET PG Law is tough, but you've come this far, na? Just take a deep breath, focus on time management, and tackle each question with calmness. Read the instruction carefully, and don't waste time on one question. Give it
Bhai, Warrant Clause ki baat karte hain to mere dimaag mein yeh aata hai ki woh Constitution ke article 20(3) ke baare mein hai. Kya aapka sawal yeh hai ki kaise Warrant Clause ko article 20(3) ke saath judaya ja sakta hai? Main sochta hoon
Main to agree hoon ki Property Law ka khauff hai, par TPA ka Thoka bhi nahi hai. Property ki vardhi mein vahanon ki chori ka case naye tareeke se ban gaya hai. Iske alawa, TPA ka dharna yeh hai ki property owner ko khud ka kuch bhi na karna
Maine aapke views sunne ke baad, ek alag sawal uthaya hai. Meri samajh se Section 218 aur 219 ke beech ka farq yeh hai ki Section 218 mein affidavit ka vistar kiya jaata hai, jabki Section 219 mein affidavit ke sath hi ek shikaar bhi diya g
Main aapke vichar se nahin samjhta.
"I disagree, yeh toh ek aisa sawal hai jo kisi bhi vakeel ke saamne aata hai. Nishana ya nishanamukh hona sabke liye ek common challenge hai. Agar main accused ka lawyer ban jata hoon, toh mujhe unki aazad khushi ke liye kaam karna hoga, ch
Yaar, I disagree with the answer provided for Q 18 on AILET 2021. According to my knowledge, Section 56(2)(viib) is applicable when the consideration is in the form of stock or shares, not just any other asset. Can someone throw more light
Aap sabhi, kya aap jaante hain ki Contract Law ek complex aur challenging topic hai lekin don't worry, main aapko yeh batana chaahta hoon ki yeh topic bahut hi interesting bhi hai! 'Contract Law: Busting the Myths' ka is topic par ek detail
Agree with the thread starter. Supreme Court vs Vellore Citizens ke case mein, jurisdictional tussle administrative law ka ek bahut hi vishisht kaaran hai. Lekin, mujhe lagta hai ki unka judment humeshaa hi sabse zyada focus lagata hai supr
Ek interesting point yeh contract law mein hota hai - 'consideration'. Kabhi-kabhi larki se ladka se shaadi karne ke liye koi proposal accept nahi karta, fir bhi proposal dete honge. Ye ek kinda consideration hai, lekin legally kuch nahi ho
Bhai, let's set the record straight on CLAT contract law. I disagree with the common myth that offer and acceptance must be clear and unambiguous. But, what if the parties have 'implied' intentions? The court can infer intent from the circu