Mujhe lagta hai FIR aur complaint mein ek bada farq hai. FIR police ke paas register hota hai, jabki complaint court ke samne present hai. FIR ko khulane ke liye evidence ki zaroorat hoti hai, jabki complaint ke liye mere khud ke statement

I think the author has touched upon a very crucial aspect of Indian legal framework, but I would like to emphasize the significance of Section 92 of the Evidence Act which deals with estoppel. It not only plays a vital role in civil matters

Yeh article bahut aacha hai! Unpacking contractual obligations through the lens of magic is such a creative way to think about our contract law syllabus. One thing I'd like to add, is how the concept of 'consideration' (adhyavasaya) in cont

"Yeh article 'The Jurisprudence of Road Rages' ka matalab ye hai ki kis tarah se road rage ka samna karna hai. Lekin, main samajh nahi paya ki is article ka focus road rage par hain ya road rage ke judicial implications hain. Kya yeh articl

Hey, this is a crucial question for all of us. While both CrPC Sec 138 & IPC can be applied in cheque bounce cases, I'd say IPC Sec 420 (cheque dishonour as criminal breach of trust) is often a preferred choice in cases where the payee has

Bhai, Section 56(2)(viib) ka matlab hai ki koi bhi company jo 500 crore se zyada ke share capital se jude huye hai, unhein khud ko "domestic company" ka status dena hoga. Ye section Budget 2013 mein introduce hua tha aur unhi company ke liy

Buddy, I feel you! CUET PG Law is tough, but you've come this far, na? Just take a deep breath, focus on time management, and tackle each question with calmness. Read the instruction carefully, and don't waste time on one question. Give it

Bhai, Warrant Clause ki baat karte hain to mere dimaag mein yeh aata hai ki woh Constitution ke article 20(3) ke baare mein hai. Kya aapka sawal yeh hai ki kaise Warrant Clause ko article 20(3) ke saath judaya ja sakta hai? Main sochta hoon

Main to agree hoon ki Property Law ka khauff hai, par TPA ka Thoka bhi nahi hai. Property ki vardhi mein vahanon ki chori ka case naye tareeke se ban gaya hai. Iske alawa, TPA ka dharna yeh hai ki property owner ko khud ka kuch bhi na karna

Maine aapke views sunne ke baad, ek alag sawal uthaya hai. Meri samajh se Section 218 aur 219 ke beech ka farq yeh hai ki Section 218 mein affidavit ka vistar kiya jaata hai, jabki Section 219 mein affidavit ke sath hi ek shikaar bhi diya g

Main aapke vichar se nahin samjhta.

"I disagree, yeh toh ek aisa sawal hai jo kisi bhi vakeel ke saamne aata hai. Nishana ya nishanamukh hona sabke liye ek common challenge hai. Agar main accused ka lawyer ban jata hoon, toh mujhe unki aazad khushi ke liye kaam karna hoga, ch

Yaar, I disagree with the answer provided for Q 18 on AILET 2021. According to my knowledge, Section 56(2)(viib) is applicable when the consideration is in the form of stock or shares, not just any other asset. Can someone throw more light

Aap sabhi, kya aap jaante hain ki Contract Law ek complex aur challenging topic hai lekin don't worry, main aapko yeh batana chaahta hoon ki yeh topic bahut hi interesting bhi hai! 'Contract Law: Busting the Myths' ka is topic par ek detail

Agree with the thread starter. Supreme Court vs Vellore Citizens ke case mein, jurisdictional tussle administrative law ka ek bahut hi vishisht kaaran hai. Lekin, mujhe lagta hai ki unka judment humeshaa hi sabse zyada focus lagata hai supr

Ek interesting point yeh contract law mein hota hai - 'consideration'. Kabhi-kabhi larki se ladka se shaadi karne ke liye koi proposal accept nahi karta, fir bhi proposal dete honge. Ye ek kinda consideration hai, lekin legally kuch nahi ho

Bhai, let's set the record straight on CLAT contract law. I disagree with the common myth that offer and acceptance must be clear and unambiguous. But, what if the parties have 'implied' intentions? The court can infer intent from the circu