Section 40(a)(ia) - A Taxing Problem ke commentary se mera sawal hain ki kaise ye section income tax mein deductibility of expenses ka case hai. Section 40(a)(ia) ka kaha hai ki jo expenses ka claim income tax return mein kiya gaya hai, uss

"Nahi, koi bhi case aisa nahin hota jahan se sab kuch saaf ho jaye. Nanavati ka case ek vishisht example hai jahan par court ne vyaktigat adhikar aur rajya ki kanooni shakti ko samajhne ki jarurat thi.

Bro, don't forget to read the fine print. Many a times, 'free' advice comes with strings attached - think 'no win no fee' lawyers charging through the nose for disbursements and VAT. Aur fir, yeh 'free advice' experts often get paid by the

"Maine padhna tha contract law ki unwritten rules ki baat, lekin mujhe lagta hai ki unhein Indian Contract Act mein shamil nahin kiya gaya hai. Jab tak contract aapne likhe hue nahin hota, tab tak unwritten rules ka bhi koi vajan hoga. Toh,

Hey guys, just finished reading the assigned book and I have to say, it's a game-changer! The chapter on 'Attempt to Commit Offence' is super insightful. Although I still have doubts about the overlap with the 'Abetment' section (Section 10

Maine socha hai, irrevocability ka concept to the Transfer of Property Act mein hi hai, lekin koi bhi contract ka violation ya breach happen kar sakta hai. Isliye, promissory estop ka concept to sirf kuch cases mein hi applicable hai, jaha

Hey guys, maine isey pehle bhi padha hai, lekin phir bhi confusion hai. Mera opinion hai ki Section 29 main 'burden of proof' ka concept hai, jabki Section 59 'burden of proving the circumstances of the 'presumption' ka regulation karta hai

Maine is article 368 ka sabse bada case, Kesavananda Bharati par kaam kiya hai. Yeh case humein batata hai kya constitution ko change karne ka koi naya rule shuru kiya jaa sakta hai ya nahin. Maine is case ka adhyayan kiya hai aur main aapk