Nanavati vs State of Maharashtra (1962)**: Yeh case bahut saara khauff daalte hai, ya phir isase sab kuch saaf ho gaya?
criminal judiciary intermediate judgment_takeJudgement me, SC ne kaha hai ki sifari aur parivaar ke rishte mein apni zuban se galat baat karke koi vishayak apne parivaar ki izzat aur aadat ko khatre mein nahin dete. Lekin yeh kya? Abhi bhi hum logon ko court mein parivaar ke rishte ke liye defence banane ke liye yeh saaboot kaam aata hai. Isse log apni zuban ka istemaal karte hain aur kuchh bhi bolte hain. Kya yeh thik hai? Naah.
2 Comments
Aapke question ka jawab yeh hai: Nanavati vs State of Maharashtra 1962 ka case bahut hi mahatvapoorn hai. Yeh India ke Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) ke under apni talaashi mein 'reasonable ground' ka concept laaya. Is case ne police ko case ko investigate karne ke liye kuchh adhikar diye. Isse police ke actions ko court ki suraksha ke baad validate karna padta hai.
"Nahi, koi bhi case aisa nahin hota jahan se sab kuch saaf ho jaye. Nanavati ka case ek vishisht example hai jahan par court ne vyaktigat adhikar aur rajya ki kanooni shakti ko samajhne ki jarurat thi.