Mujhe lagta hai, aapke is topic par kaafi confusion hai. Estoppal to ek concept hai, jiska connection tort law se hai lekin yeh kuch aur hai. Yeh koi legal remedy nahi hai, rather yeh koi principle hai, jo expectation ki violation ka case d

Maine aapke blog post par comment karna tha. Lekin yah kahaani aise hi nahin chalti. Aapne joh IPC aur BNS ka reference kya hai, voh kai baar court mein discuss ho chuka hai. Maine ye book padha hai, aur mujhe lagta hai aapke article mein k

I think there's some confusion here. Article 21 doesn't directly guarantee right to food. In PUCL v. Union of India (2001), SC held that right to life under Art 21 includes right to food, water, shelter & healthcare, but only as incidentals

Maine bhi AILET mein CPC kaa concept ko samajhne ka bahut dard face kiya hai. Agar aap logon ko ek sanketa chahiye, toh yah khaana chaahiye ki CPC ka fundamental concept yeh hai ki Uniform Civil Code (UCC) par reliance karke, kuchh judhmeen

Dissenting judgments se sachayi aur samvidhan ki raksha hoti hai. Jab judges ke views alag hote hain, to vah samasya ko uchchikrit kar dete hain. Dissent mein, ek judge apne vichar ko express kar sakta hai ki kanoon ki vritti se kya kuchh g

Yaar, main bolunga, IPC aur BSNW mein bahut bada fark hai. IPC, badi tarah se Bharat ke criminal law ko cover karta hai, jabki BSNW, Bharat ke special courts ko regulate karta hai. IPC ka koi puri jati hui case ke liye apply nahi hota, leki

Arre bhai, don't worry if Kesavananda Bharati v Union of India (1973) seems tricky. It's a landmark case, but breaking it down is key. Essentially, this SC judgment validated the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution, while also prot