"Haan bhai, issue toh yahi hai ki abhilasha ki wajah se arjun ko murder kehte hain, lekin abhilasha ne arjun ko khatre ke liye majboor nahin kiya tha. Yahaan mansouki ke liye prashna hai. Section 300 ka 2nd explanation yahaan apply hota hai

Bhai, main aapke saath nahin hoon. Evidence Act aur BSA ka emphasis CLAT PG aur AILET PG par lagana theek nahi hai, kyunki donon exams mein civil law ka focus hota hai. Civil law mein Evidence Act aur BSA ka content thoda alag hota hai. CLA

"Mujhe yeh book bahut aam hai, lekin maine yeh samjha kewal half-truths aur partial perspectives pe base kiya hai. Constitution ki vishishttaon ko samajhne ke bajay yeh book uska upyog karta hai apni aisi-saasi vichardharaaon ko jaagruk kar

Main khush nahi hoon, Company Law mein yeh baat theek nahi hai. Tum Company ka concept to samajh raho, par yeh aise explain kiya jaa raha hai jaise hum kuch bhi samajh rahe hain. Company ka registration, incorporation, kaptaan ki role... sa

Hey guys, I read the topic and I'm still confused about cheque bounce cases. Isn't it true that the Indian Penal Code (IPC) only deals with cheque bounce as a criminal offense if the cheque bounce happens with the intention of causing harm

Main toh yeh toh nahi samjhta ki unhone Section 26C CPC ka arth yeh is tareeke se de diya hai! Yeh toh Section 151 CPC ka ek hi arth hai, aur wah hi hai, kisi prakaar ka niyam nahi apnata jisase ki court ki sarkar ko koi bhi niyam apnana ha

"Yeh article bahut hi achha hai! 'The Evidence Act: A Double-Edged Sword' pe likha hai kaisa laga kya? Main samajhne ki koshish kar raha hun kya yeh act kaise kanooni kaadhiyon ko sahayit karta hai, aur kyon kuch vishayon mein iska pratikar

"Arrey, yeh post bahut hi acchi hai! Ye sab baatein, jinke baare mein hum log andar-bahar sochte hain, is post ne clear kiya hai ki kya real hai aur kya nahin. Sabse important baat ye hai ki ye laws apne fayde ke liye hain, but unhe apply k