Criminal Law ka Rukhsat: Section 300 mein Abhilasha aur Arjun ka Vihal
criminal judiciary advanced mcq_debateKuch din pehle, mera dost Arjun ne kaha ki Abhilasha ki murdabad ek Qatl-e-Amd ki madad hai, lekin maine mana ki yeh Qatl-e-Hasht-e-Suwar ki madad hai. Pehli baat yeh hai ki Abhilasha ne apne dushman ko bina koi dawai ki zaroorat kee jaane pe chhod diya, jismein woh khatre mein padta hai. Arjun ka kaha hai ki isse pata lagta hai ki Abhilasha ne apne dushman ke khatre ka khayanat kiya hai aur yeh ek qatl-e-amd ka karya hai.
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
"Haan bhai, issue toh yahi hai ki abhilasha ki wajah se arjun ko murder kehte hain, lekin abhilasha ne arjun ko khatre ke liye majboor nahin kiya tha. Yahaan mansouki ke liye prashna hai. Section 300 ka 2nd explanation yahaan apply hota hai, kyunki arjun ko khata hai, lekin abhilasha ne koi majboori nahin thi.