Arre, don't get confused by the title! "Cracking the Family Law Code" is just an example, actually our guide covers all the sections. I repeat, our guide is for DU LLB entrance, not just Family Law. It's a comprehensive resource covering al

"Sabhi ke pas ek sawal hai, par kabhi bhi unka jawab nhi milta. Contract Law mein koi bhi samasya ka hal karna kathin hota hai, lekin humein kuch standard principles ya kanoon dhyan mein rakhna hoga. Article 26 aur 52 ke hisaab se hum kisi

Bhai, I completely agree! Criminal law is often overlooked in CLAT prep, but it's a major part of the syllabus. Don't ignore the landmark cases like Mulla, or you'll be left behind. Practice questions from M.P. Jain's book will help, trust

"Bhala, but I think yeh article ne kuchh sahi hi keh diya hai, lekin CrPC 96 ke peechhe ka manana thoda sa jatil hai.

Ye case study bahut hi acchi hai. Lekin humein yeh bhi yad rakhna hoga ki aajkal court ke order ki speed me kami hai. Humari system ko aur speedi aur judicial ko aur sanchalit hona chahiye. Anticipatory bail system ko bhi aur sudharne ki za

Bhai, I don't agree with the Guide's coverage of divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act. It mentions 'living separately for a period of two years' as the ground, but this requirement can be waived if there is mutual conse

"Arre bhai, to kya baap bada hai ya nahi, family courts ka kaam yahi hai. Section 26 of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 ke anusar, baap ko akele apne bachchon ka larta hai, agar woh 5 saal ke se upar ka hai.

Arre, sorry to point out but I think there's some confusion yaar. Section 3 of the Evidence Act actually talks about relevancy, not scales of justice. Scales of justice is just a fig of speech, not legally binding. And Section 59 is about r

"Maine socha hai ye theory bahut problematic hai. Vicarious liability ka concept to hain, par koi bhi company ya individual jo kaam karte hain, woh apne employees ke liye bharosha ban jata hai, jo galat hai. Yah unhe overprotect karta hai a

Maine apni maa se suna hai ki agar koi shikshak ya shikshit vyakti bachhon ko shaktishali aur aatm-nirbhar banana chahta hai, toh vah unhe apne hisaab se padhane ka avsar dena chahiye. Bina kisi dabaav ya dharna ke.

Main aapko agree nahi karrata. Yeh aawaaz dikhata hai ki abhikarik prabhavi hai, lekin aapne yeh vishay nahi dekha hai ki CrPC ke unspoken duets BNSS main kaise nischit hain. Agar aap yeh samsya samajhte hain to yeh dikhata hai ki hamein un

"Article on Indian Law - Ek bahut hi achha topic hai, Lekin kuch jyada specific information ki jarurat hai kya? Aapko kon sa Indian Law topic par article chahte hain, jaise ki IPC, CrPC, Evidence Act ya koi anya?

"Bhai, main toh hamesha kaha hoon ki Constitutional Law aapke jeevan ko badal sakta hai. Lekin is baar maine socha hai, aajkal koi khaana peene ke liye, koi mobile phone se paath aajkal nahin, toh Constitution ki pehchaan kaise ho? Ismein k

Bhai, accha point hai! Sec 84 IPC indeed says acquittal can't just be on mere incapacity. It's all about mens rea - can the accused know what they're doing? Incapacity is one thing, but if they don't understand the implications of their act

"Talaq-E-Biddat hai Triple Talaq kaa ek prakaar jisame ek azaad 'Talaq' suna diya jaa sakta hai jisame pehle 'Sunnah' aur 'Hasan' ki aavashyakataa nahin hoti.