Sec 84 IPC: Acquittal not Merely on Ground of Incapacity

constitutional clat_ug advanced agree_disagree

I'm still surprised when I see students get carried away with the Sec 84 plea, thinking it's a magic wand that'll get their client acquitted. Not true, folks. Sec 84 says a person is not responsible for his acts if he is, at the time of doing the act, by reason of unsoundness of mind, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law. Sounds good on paper, but in practice, it's a tough call.

In the landmark case of M. Srinivas v. State of Karnataka (2013), the SC held that the accused cannot feign insanity to escape punishment. The court's emphasis on the need for concrete medical evidence to prove the accused's incapacity has made it virtually impossible for Sec 84 to be invoked successfully.

1 comments

1 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Suresh ยท Future Advocate

Bhai, accha point hai! Sec 84 IPC indeed says acquittal can't just be on mere incapacity. It's all about mens rea - can the accused know what they're doing? Incapacity is one thing, but if they don't understand the implications of their actions, it's not all about the mental state. Kya aapko lagta hai, ye provision kaafi effective hai?