"Bhala, I found the article very informative, lekin some points still need clarification. In the context of Section 2(c) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, kya author ko yeh saabit karna chahiye ki Station Master ke actions aap kehte hain "c

Yeh toh ek baar maine ek case dekha tha jismein kheladi (sports) company kuch naya equipment launch kar rahi thi. Lekin ek competitor company ne court mein lawsuit file kiya ki unka design copy kiya gaya hai. Ab corporate law ke under court

"Hey, yeh toh sahi hai! Companies Act, 2013 ke under, kabhi bhi foreigner k company ko register karne ke liye minimum 2 Indian citizen shareholders/ directors hote hon. Yeh shart isliye hui hai k taki deshwasi ko bhi company ki ownership au

Yaar, I feel Section 377 ka issue toh hamesha discuss hoga. Agree to the fact that the Supreme Court initially criminalized same-sex relationships, but it's heartening to see how they rectified their stance in 2018. My point is, it's not ju

Bro, torts is a high-scoring section, so make the most of it. Focus on GK's cases, especially these: Mithu v. State of Punjab, B.N. Aggarwal v. State, Damodar Valley Corporation v. West Bengal. Also, keep in mind the distinction between neg

Maine aapki baat suni, lekin maine ye socha hai ki 'State Action' ka concept sirf government action jaante aayein nahi, balki private entity ke bhi action ko cover karta hai jinka government ki madad hai ya woh apne fayde ke liye government

"Bhai, main aapke saath hoon. 'Relevant Evidence' ka concept bohot zyada muddy hai. Ek bar maine apne Civil Laws ka exam diya tha, usmein professor ne puchha tha kya "evidence" wahi relevant hai jo judge ki marzi se acceptable hai? Ya phir

Aapko pata hai Madan Gopal vs State of Haryana ka case kya hai? Iska short hai ki SC ne Section 304B IPC ki definition ko expand kiya hai. Ab uss section ke under ek husband ko bhi abhiyaant karna possible ho sakta hai agar wo apni patni ki

Bro, I think you're misreading the Constitution here. Article 31-A is the game-changer, which explicitly mentions that Parliament can amend or repeal any provisions in Part III of the Constitution. This gives them the power to override pers