Bhai, CRPC ko samjhne ke liye "B.N. Awad in after" ke baad ka dhyaan zaroori hai. Yeh kehna hai ki 1st October 1923 ke baad, kya changes aaye the CRPC mein, jisse iska purana version pura surakshit nahi raha.

"Nice article, sab theek hai! You raised an interesting point about Dhoni's intentions in the DRS controversy. Agar aapko lagta hai ki 'intent to strike' ka concept aapne batting mein bhi laga do, toh kya wo khelna sahi rahega? Isse batting

Bhai, don't worry, contract law ke liye practice karo aur basics suno. Black's Law Dictionary se sab kuch padho, aur Contract Act ke chapters ko thoda thoda padho. AP LAWCET ka strategy yeh hai, sirf focus karo, aur notes ko 2-3 baar padho.

Meh, article ka point valid hai, but they completely missed the role of judiciary in IP cases. SC's verdicts in cases like Novartis v. India, 2013, have been a game-changer, setting new precedents for patentability. Jab tak SC ki decisions

Bhai, aapka point bahut accha hai. Lekin mere hisaab se, evidence adalat mein jo proof sambhav hai, uske alawa court kuch bhi mang sakta hai. Section 35, Section 53 aur Section 65B ke madhyam se adalat apne liye aur evidence mang sakta hai.

Maine to aap logon ko is lecture se pehle hi jaana tha ki yeh myth-busting ka ek zaroori hoga. Lekin jo unhone kaha hai ki Article 355 kuch bhi nahi hai, main use agree karta hoon. Isse humko Constitution ke basic structure par focus karna

Tortious Times ahead is much needed for our CLAT UG aspirants! The book provides a thorough understanding of the complex topics like negligence, damages, and intentional torts. I fully agree with the approach of making the complex easy to g

Abhi to humne kuch ni samajha, power of judicial review ki baat karte hue. Kya hai aapke question? Supreme Court judiciary review ke zamaane mein kya karta hai? Voh court ke rules, laws, and govt karyavaahakon ke actions ko review kar sakta

Maine aapki baat samajh li hai, lekin mujhe lagta hai ki custody aur guardianship ek dusre se alag nahi hain. Dono mein parivaarik adhikar aur bachchon ki raksha shamil hai. Guardianship ke liye, court ko samruddhi, sahayog aur bachchon ki

Yaar, agar aapko Duaa ki zaroorat puchh rahi hai to aapko pata hi hoga ki Duaa ki zaroorat to isse Res Gestae se judi hai. Res Gestae is case mein, apni apni karyavahi kar rahe karte hain, aur Duaa ki zaroorat to wahan aati hai jab aapki ka

Arre, this topic of Company Law is like a maze, but don't worry, you got this! As you navigate from Finance to Law, just remember, Company Law is all about understanding those complexities. Focus on the key areas like incorporation, managem

"Mittal v. Kumar ek ajeeb case tha. Sabse pahle yeh batana hai ki koi vishay ya karya jab aapke upar dhyan rakhne ke bajai aapke pass hota hai, tab uska upyog le sakte hain. Lekin yadi aap uska upyog lete hain tab aapke upar bhi liability h

Arre, Pavithra Sridhar ka kaam toh bahut praiseworthy hai. Unka work kuchh special cases mein aaya hai jaise woh Madras HC me case diya tha jismein marriage registration ke liye koi special certificate require nahi hota. Unke arguments ko S

Yeh to bahut accha topic hai... CrPC aur BNSS ke beech difference to kuch isse hai. CrPC mein section 37-151 hai, jo police ki shaktiyan define karti hai. BNSS to civil procedures ka adhikar hai, jo court ke under chalti hai. Dono alag-alag

Bhai, agar main sochun, Section 52(1) ka confusion to isme se hai ki kya yeh private copying, research, criticism, review ya reporting ke liye copyright ke prati anumati deta hai ya nahin. Isme se kuch experts ka kahna hai ki yeh anumati ha

Hey, let's break it down. IPC 307 deals with 'Attempt to Murder', while 302 is for 'Punishment for Murder'. The key difference lies in intent. Under 307, if a person attempts to kill but fails, punishment is generally up to 10 years. Howeve

Mujhe lagta hai, article mein baat karni chahta hoon. Lekin yeh sahi hai ki Right to Privacy ko Constitutionalising karne ka yeh ek majboot aavshan hai. Court ke naye nirdesh karenge ki citizens ka data protection guarantee karenge, aur yeh

Maine toh vishwas nahin karta ki adoption ke liye guardian's consent zaroori hona chahiye. Agar koi bachcha apne parivaar se behtar jivan bhuja raha ho to uski adopt karne mein koi baat nahin hai. Guardian ki ichha se koi bachcha apne aapko

Bhai, let's break it down. Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide is not the same as Section 304 Part II, abetment of dowry death. The key difference is intent - 306 requires direct intent to drive someone to suicide, whereas 304 part II i