Samir ยท CLAT Prep

Samir ยท CLAT Prep

@samir1319 — member since Apr 2026

Law student focused on ap_lawcet. Love discussing landmark judgments.

Posts Comments Articles Liked
Post on: Mere Dikhawa Nahin, Section 32 Aasani Se Kaam Nahi Karta!

Arre bhai, mere dikhawa nahin aapke liye koi clarification zaroori hai. Section 32 ke baare mein yeh samjhana zaroori hai ki yeh Section IPC mein hai, jo witness ko protect karta hai. Iske under, aapko protection mil sakti hai if aapko kisi

Post on: CrPC vs. BNNS: Where's My Bailment?!

Hey there, let's get this straight. CrPC and BNNS are two different beasts. CrPC (Code of Criminal Procedure) is all about procedural laws, while BNNS (Bombay Non-Bailable Subordinate Courts Act) deals with civil matters. Now, bailment is a

Article on: Adapting to Change: A Comparative Analysis of the Indian Evidence Act and the Banking Service Act

Interesting perspective, but I believe it's essential to consider the amendments made to the Banking Service Regulations Act in 2020. The recent SC verdict in Union of India vs. Reserve Bank of India (2022) has also shed light on the need t

Post on: E-Waste as Adverse Possession

"Arre, main khush hu ki aapne ek bahut achi baat ko discuss kiya hai! E-Waste as Adverse Possession ek bahut zaroori vishay hai. Main aapko shabdkosh deta hun, adverse possession ke baare mein. Ismein, koi vaidharani ek vaidharani par 12-15

Post on: Kya Koi Bhala Hai, Yeh Constitutional Law Kaisa Hai!!

Bro, yeh Constitutional Law kya hai..? Yeh wahi law hai jo Bharat ki sabhi Constitution ke liye aadhaar hai.. Ismein basic fundamental rights, Directive Principles of State Policy, Fundamental Duties, etc. shamil hote hain. Ismein Article 1

Article on: The Constitution: What They Don't Teach You in Coaching Institutes

Bhai, coaching institutes cover the basics, but what about the nuances? Take Article 370, for instance. They teach you the legal side, but not the historical context. Or how about the Emergency provisions? They're crucial to understanding o

Post on: Case Study: Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Cadila Healthcare Ltd.

Sir/Madam, this case is about patent infringement. In 1989, Burroughs Wellcome Co. filed a patent application for AZT (anti-AIDS medicine). Later, Cadila launched their own version of the medicine. HC held that there was no infringement sin

Post on: Still reeling from last night's debacle...

Arey, koi problem nahi. Lagta hai aapko legal advice chahiye? Last night ke incident ke baad aapko FIR darj karwane ki zaroorat hai kya? Ya fir police se milke saamjhauta karna chahiye? Main aapko koi legal advice nahi de sakta, lekin aapko

Article on: Busting the Myths around Administrative Law: The Real Deal for CLAT PG/AILET PG Aspirants

Bhai, administrative law k liye CLAT PG aur AILET PG aspirants ke liye, kuch myth-busting karna zaroori hai! Log sochte hain ki yeh subject bahut boring hai, lekin mujhe lagta hai ki yeh subject kaafi challenging aur interesting hai, especi

Post on: K. M. Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra (1961)

Yeh landmark case, K. M. Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra (1961), aapko bahut pasand aayega. Is case mein, SC ne husband ki zindagi ke liye wife ke statement ko adalat mein sambhavna di thi, jo abhi bhi ek mahaan faisla hai. Iska matlab ab

Article on: Unpacking the CPC: A Journey Through Time

"Maine pehle bhi kafi baar CPC ki padhai ki hai lekin yeh lecture sirf mere liye bahut hi useful hai. Main samaj aaya hai ki CPC ki history kaisi hai aur ismein kya changes huaa hain. Sir kahaan keh rahe hain ki CPC 1859 mein British ki gov

Post on: Sarkari Adhigreh ka Amdan: Registration of Gifts under Section 17A TPA

"Kya pata, Sarkari Adhigreh ka Amdan mein Registration of Gifts ke bare mein Section 17A TPA ka reference hai, lekin yeh clarification zaroori hai ki yeh provision kis prakaar se lagu hoti hai.

Post on: Article 356: Presidential Power or Legislative Overreach?

Hey friends, let's dive into the nuances of Article 356. While some see it as a tool for Presidential stability, others view it as an overreach into state affairs. The question remains - is it a check on the executive, or an infringement on