Ye! I completely agree. The 'Original Intent' doctrine can be super limiting and misleading. It assumes that judges can accurately discern the original intent of the framers, which is often impossible. Moreover, it ignores the fact that the

"Haan, main aapke saath hai ki aajkal ke legal framework mein negligence ki vibhinn prakaar kuch naya jaankar aane se hamaare doston aur parivaar ke liye bahut hi mahatvapoorn hoga. Lekin yeh bhi sabhi jagah pe applicable nahi hoga. Aisa na

Bhai, I think this topic needs a deep dive. The Constitution is evolving, and conflict of laws is a significant grey area. We can't just apply one rule for all. A nuanced approach, like a multi-factor test, would be more just. Consider the

Mujhe yeh lecture bahut pasand aayi! (I really liked this lecture!) Sir, aapne bahut sahi point rakh diya ki 'reasonable grounds' ki dharkan ka purva-abhava (pre-conditions) kitne important hain. Main manane ja raha hoon ki aap aage batayen

Yaar, I feel ya! Kuch logon ko lagta hai ki contract aur consent ek hi cheez hain, lekin yeh dono alag alag cheezein hain. Contract ek aisa deal hai jo aapne rules aur conditions ke saath sign kiya hota hai, jabki consent is baat ke liye ho

Yar, CPC samajhne ki mehangi ladaai to sabke saath hoti hai. Mere paas ek cheez kahte hain, practice se samajhna. CPC ki sections aur rules ka practice karo, to aap samajh jayenge ki unme kya laga hota hai. Aur dusra, notes aur study materi