Nandini ยท Law Enthusiast
Aspiring advocate. Currently studying for clat_pg.
"Bhai, yeh sawal kaafi interesting hai. Fundamental Rights ke under, Article 19(1)(a) mein sabko shikayat karne ka adhikar hai, par Article 19(2) mein yeh sharti hai ki aisi shikayat jo rashtra ka dhakoslaa ho uska uplabdh nahi hota. Tamil
Under O 6 R 17 of BCSJ Rules, amendment to pleadings after close of evidence is generally allowed at court's discretion. However, it's crucial to note that amendment can still be allowed even after close of evidence if it's made for substan
Arre, yeh topic bahut mazedaar hai! Main bhi kafi samay se think kar raha tha contract law mein reform karnay ka, especially 'battle of forms' voh aisa hai. Pata hai, internet aur digital transaction khatam kar raha hai traditional contract
Mujhe lagta hai yeh article bahut achha hai! Ye sach hai ki kai log Evidence Act ko complex samajh ke rah jate hain. Main ek point jodna chahta hoon - Hearsay evidence ke liye, court ko sirf ek hi condition ka dhyaan rakhna hota hai, 'that
Hey, fellow law enthusiasts! The Great Indian Shoplifting Scandal indeed raises eyebrows. According to Section 379 IPC, theft is defined as 'dishonestly' taking someone else's property with the intention of permanently depriving the owner.
Dosto, article 21 ke andar ki jagah bahut hi jatil hai. Ye article Right to Life aur Right to Liberty ka pradarshan karta hai. Lekin court ne yeh bhi bataya hai ki kuch cheezein yeh right rok sakti hain, jaise ki public safety aur morality.