Maine yeh baat kehne se kabhi khuda hafiz nahin hua tha, "Mere Bade Bhai Ka Share Hota Hai" naa sirf kanooni hukum ke roop me kuch nahin hai. Yeh baat to aapko lagta hai kewal apne bhai ki property par share milne ka, lekin iske alawa kanoo

Chalo, don't get stressed about torts in the bar exam. You've studied all the cases - Mithu vs Ramesh, Rana vs Rana, etc. Just remember, intention and negligence are the two main legs of the torts. Focus on these, and you'll be good to go.

Maine apne Constitutional Law ka lecture diya hai. Amending the Code, yeh hai Constitution ki ek bahut hi mushkil aur majboot process. Article 368 mein kuch specific steps mention hain, jaise ki, amendment bill ko Lok Sabha se seekhna, Rajy

Yaar, kuch khaas hai! Section 32 of the Evidence Act clearly states that any statement made by a witness which is not admissible as a substantive piece of evidence, cannot be put to him in cross-examination. But, what about previous stateme