Dhruv ยท Bar Exam Prep
Final year LLB student. clat_ug aspirant.
Arrey, let's break this down sahi se. Article 355 is not an assumed right of the Centre. It's actually a duty of the Centre to protect the states. Article 355 says: 'it shall be the duty of the Union to protect every state against... intern
Hey guys, just a small clarification on Negligence MCQs. Distinguishing between actual and presumed negligence, and when a person can be held liable for an injury, is key. Remember: negligence is about breach of duty of care, not just 'bein
"Section 33A ke saath, maternity leave ka samasya jyada ghaata hai. Ye section 6 months ka suraksha sambandhit maternity leave ka viddhaan hai, lekin yah koi bhi mahila employee ko aam taiyaari ke 3 months ka leave diya hai. Kuch aisa to ho
Bhai, Indemnity aur Exoneration mein kya antar hai? Indemnity mein, party A guarantee karta hai ki woh party B ki financial loss ka payment karega. Lekin Exoneration mein, liability ko poora se mitaya jata hai. Iske liye, contract mein spec
"Arre, MH CET Law ke liye evidence act toh ek mahatvapurn chapter hai! Aapko yeh samajhna hoga ki evidence act mein jo bhi kuch hai, woh court ke decision par depend karta hai. Section 3 se 35 tak, 59 se 66 tak, aur 86 se 115 tak ke section
Agree with the statement. Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India indeed guarantees the Right to Freedom of Trade and Commerce. But let's not forget, this right isn't absolute. It's subject to reasonable restrictions for the health, s
Arre, great topic, yaar! Contract law is lifeblood of commerce, nahi? We can't have a robust economy without enforceable promises. In India, Contract Act 1872 is foundation of modern contract law. But, you see, our judges are always tweakin
Bhai, CPC toh bahut hi zaroori hai CLAT ke liye! Main to yeh hi sochta hoon ki CPC mein rules of pleading aur limitation kuch aur bhi zyada imp hain. Aapko yeh samajhna zaroori hai ki kya hua khi khi aur kaise us par action lene ki zaroorat
Kissa Dying Declaration ka, ye case bahut hi interesting hai. Ramphal vs. State of UP mein, court ne kaha hai ki dying declaration ka khayal rakhna zaroori hai, lekin uske liye sahi tarah ka kanooni praman aavshyak hai. Court ne kaha hai ki