Hey y'all, don't worry, Section 123 is indeed a tricky one! Just break it down, abhi toh 123 ka matlab hai - if a candidate is found guilty of corrupt practices or any electoral malpractices, you can disqualify him. But there's a catch, abe

Dear Sahi, TTPA mein aisa nahi hai ki 'Right to Sue' koi bhi karyaanvay apne vishvas mein khelon ki shuruat kar sakta hai. Haan, TTPA mein 'Right to Sue' hai, lekin yah sirf usi tak hadaav raha hai jiski arthathy mein aap 'Right to Enforce'

Arre yaar, let's be clear on this - binding art of contract law does not exist as a separate concept in Indian jurisprudence. It's actually the doctrine of consideration that makes a contract legally binding, not some fancy 'art' of it. We

Bhai/sister, main aapko yeh zaroorat se zyada dhyan dekhne ki jarurat nahi hai. Jurisprudence ko samajhne ke liye aapko apne basics aur fundamental concept ko theek se samajhna hoga. Aapko Kelsen, Austin, Hart, aur Dworkin jaise vicharkarti

Haan, main toh CLAT mock test ka experience bahut negative liya. Evidence Act mein sab questions pehle hi hiye the, jaise hi paper chala. BSA chapter bhi bahut asaani se solve ho gaya tha. Mera mante hai ki CLAT team pehle hi yeh test banak