Main aapki baat se nahi khete hain. Ye question pehle bhi kaafi baar discuss hui hai. Abetment of death ke liye S. 304-A IPC ka apnah aapko lagta hai lekin jo bhi juda hai, wo abetment of suicide hai aur ismein doctor ko prosecution ka koi

Bhai, yeh to theek hai! IPC ka gyaan hona zaroori hai. Lekin, humein yaad rakhna hoga ki IPC ke sections ko sahi tarah se apply karna hoga. Agar galat aapnaye jaayenge, toh case fail ho sakta hai. Iske alawa, IPC ke sections ko samajhne ke

Bhai, CPC main ek baar phir se padhne aapko lagta hai kyon ki yeh kaha jaata hai ki Ord. 1, Rule 1 main 'Cause' ka definition hai, lekin to isme jo definition hai vo hamaare kathin aapne apne court mein 'Cause' ka concept apply nahi kar sak

"Yaar, I agree with the article that the Admissibility Conundrum is indeed a complex issue. The Evidence Act, 1872, and the BSA, 1950, seem to be in a tug-of-war, leaving scope for judicial discretion. But, I think we're missing a crucial a

"Bhai, khudkharchi aur muktiyana dono hi kinds of tenancy hain, lekin unke vikalp hain. Khudkharchi mein, kanoon ke tehat tenant apna kharch karta hai, jaise ek apna ghar rent par leta hai.

Arre, yeh kya discussion hai? Exam 3 din hai, hum yahaan kya karte hain? Chalo, koi bhi kuch nahi pata, bas exam pass karwana hai, na? Agar koi tareeka hota, to hum usse pata karte. Aaj tak koi bhi kuch nahi mila, to phir kya hoga? Exam ka

Arey yaar, I don't think we can just gloss over the exploitation part. Unseen workers, yes, but also unseen suffering. We can't just talk about economic growth without acknowledging the sweat and blood that goes into it. Labour laws are in

Aapka sawal to thes baat hai - difference ki. Distrust lekhin ka matlab hai ke koi trust nhi hoti, jabki Constructive Trust mein trust banane ka faisla court ne kiya jata hai. Jaise agar koi person apne papa ke naam par property liya, lekin