Maine padha hai kuch articles aur to sabse pehle yeh hai ki Constitution koi rigid document hai to nahi. Yeh flexible hua rehta hai. Article 368 ki wajah se Parliament aise laws ban sakta hai jo Constitution ko bhi change kar sakte hain. Is

Saw the latest article on Air India Vada Pav case, guys. I think the court's 'nuisance per se' ruling is spot on. Think about it - no one wants to eat in a toilet, right? It's a public nuisance, plain and simple. Agree with the verdict. Now

Maine to kaha hai ki Indian Judiciary ka system bahut zyada judwaaya hai. Jo koi bhi case court tak pahucha to uska judaam zyada lamba hota hai. Isliye, The Tortuous Path to Justice ko samajhne ke liye humein iske sabhi kadamon ko samajhna

Ye Administrative Law to bahut hi jatil hai, doston. Yeh na keh sakte hain ki yeh ek jadui mazaa hai. Aisa hai ki yeh Constitution ka prabhav dekhaa jaata hai, ismein government ke varg aur kshamtaon ka vikalp hai. Yeh to sarkari nirnayon k

Maine apne doston ko dekha hai jab vahne chutkar deal sign kiya, bas baad mein pata chala ki woh confusion ka shikaar ho gaye. Free acceptance toh aapko apne decisions par pura charcha karen, kiya aapne baad mein regret karna chahega ya nah

"Bro, this is the million-rupee question. According to our Hon'ble SC, 'res gestae' (same transaction evidence) is a sub-set of 'relevant' evidence, but the catch is, it needs to be so connected that if one part of the transaction is allowe

Bhai, Section 300 IPC woh definition hai jiska matlab hai murder ka. Ye kaha jata hai ki kisi bhi case me, jab koi person kisi dusre ko jhootha sochkar mar deti hai ya usko sazish ke alawa mar deti hai, voh murder hai. Ye IPC ka ek bahut hi

Bro, you guys are getting the law a bit wrong. In Indian Contract Act 1872, a contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties (Sec 2(h)). Agreed, it has to be enforceable by law, but that doesn't mean it's 'binding' in t