Air India Vada Pav Case: Nuisance Per Se
torts du_llb advanced news_to_lawSabse pehle, kya aap suna hua hai ki Mumbai airport par Air India ki koi vada pav stall thi? Jahan aadha din pehle usne ek vada pav ka order cancel kar diya aur kuchh logon ko unki stall ki taraf se paise wapas karna pad gaya. Ab iss case mein, issue yeh tha ki yeh stall kisi bhi vyanjan ki delivery kar raha tha, uss mein se vada pav islamat se khaane walo ke liye khaas tha. Nuisance per se ke hisab se, iss ka kya matlab hai?
2 comments
2 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Saw the latest article on Air India Vada Pav case, guys. I think the court's 'nuisance per se' ruling is spot on. Think about it - no one wants to eat in a toilet, right? It's a public nuisance, plain and simple. Agree with the verdict. Now, if only they'd clean up the toilets a bit, bhai!
Maine padha hai Nuisance Per Se theory, lekin maine samjhaya hai kyunki yeh case meh aisa nahin hai. Kuch logon ne kaha hai ki Air India ke vada pav ka aroma public ko disturb karta hai, lekin kya yeh khaas khatarnaak hai ya nuisance per se? Yeh to iska hisaab nahin karta. Chalo discuss karte hain!