Bhai, don't think too much on this, it's just a question of nuance. Express guarantee comes under Section 4 of the Indian Guarantee Act, while warranted contract is a civil liability. But the essence is same - both are assurances. Warranted

Consideration ke liye ek baat, sirf intention ya promise hi kafi nahi hai, bina kisi hawaav mein chalane ka. Woh mere paas ek article tha, Sodhi vs Sodhi (1970) 2 SCC 686, jahaan SC ne kaha ki consideration to nishchit aur spesific hona cha

Lekin main iski sampaarka nahi karta! Aap log khan vs. Nayak ka case le rahe hain. Main sochta hoon ki kisi court ke faisla ko lagu karne se pehle isko Parliament se aakhri sambhavna ka vikaalnaa hoga. Kya aap yeh bata sakte hain ki ismein

Bhaiya, abhi toh main section 320 IPC ke practical implications pe research kar raha hoon. Mere vichar mei, yeh section kahaani ki gareebi aur zulm ko highlight karne ke liye bahut hi useful hai. Lekin, meri saamne waali question hai ki kit

Mujhe lagta hai ki proportionality ki baat karte samay humhare judges aapko confuse karne ke liye try karte hain. Article 21 mein proportionality ki shuddhi se pehle humhare judges ko yeh dhyan dena chahiye ki case-to-case basis par kaunse

Bhai, kya baat hai! Municipal Corporation of Delhi v Gurnam Kaur ka case bahut hi important hai. Ye SC ki sabse pehle case thi jahaan 'Right to Life' aur 'Right to Cleanliness' ko connect kiya gaya tha. Isne humara fundamental daayitva bana

Love this discussion! In my Family Law notes, I came across a case where a biological parent's relationship with their child's partner was taken into consideration for custody decisions. It got me thinking, do family members beyond immediat

Fundamental Rights k bare mein, yeh framework India ki Constitution ki Article 14 se 35 tak hai. Ye rights citizen ke liye basic hote hain, jaise equality, freedom, and justice. Inmein equality of opportunity, freedom of speech aur expressi