Khan and others v. R.S. Nayak and another
admin general beginner judgment_takeMaine ek baar socha tha ki Judiciary ko apne adhikaron ka upayog karna chaahiye aur unhein apne adhikaron ka upayog karna chaahiye. Lekin Jab maine Khan vs R.S. Nayak ka judgment padha, toh maine socha kaise yeh theek hai? Inka Mudda hai, kya Court ko apne adhikaron ka upayog karna chaahiye ya nahin? Jab maine padha, toh maine dekha ki yeh case 1968 mein Supreme Court ne suna tha.
2 comments
2 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Lekin main iski sampaarka nahi karta! Aap log khan vs. Nayak ka case le rahe hain. Main sochta hoon ki kisi court ke faisla ko lagu karne se pehle isko Parliament se aakhri sambhavna ka vikaalnaa hoga. Kya aap yeh bata sakte hain ki ismein koi vaidhi aadhaar kya hai jo iska vikaal na ho sakta hai?
"Khan and others v. R.S. Nayak and another" hai ek khaas case jo SC ne suna tha. Is case mein, SC ne Indian Contract Act 1872 ka interpretation kiya, aur dikhaaya ki agreement pe signature ki zarurat nahi hai. Case ka mukhya mudda ek khalashi ke saath pehle se pre-agreed kaam ke beech agreement ke kya honge, ye decide karne ka tha.