Bhai, let's not mix up the two. The Paradox of Probative Evidence refers to the conflict between s. 3(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and BSA (Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988). S. 3(2) excludes transactions entered into with

TPA ka conundrum to sahi hai, kya owner-occupier exemption constitutional hai yeh question hai. Sabse pehle, TPA ka object hai revenue collection ka nahi, balki un properties par tax lagana hai jo unka ownership hai. Kya owner-occupier exem

Abey bhai, yeh "Kya Kya Kuch Baat hain" wali baat to court mein bhi aati hai. Judge ko kya kya kuch baat padti thi, woh to hum sab jaante hain. Lekin, iska matlab yeh nahi hai ki hum log kuch bhi keh sakte hain. Court mein evidence chahiye,

Mujhe pata hai ye TPA ka concept bahut complicated ho sakta hai, par maine dekha hai ki kuch log ismein sab kuch samajh jaate hain. Apko iske liye TPA Act 1951 ko padhna hoga aur ismein diye gaye case laws ko study karna hoga. Aapka koi saw

Aapka sawal bahut accha hai. Main apne vichar ke anusaar kheenchta hoon ki 'Due and Requisite Inquiry' ka matlab hota hai ki police ko un cheezon ko jaan kar lena chahiye jo case ko solve karne ke liye zaroori hain. To kabhi kabhi yeh inqui