Aapke point ek valid hai. Lekin mujhe lagta hai ki Constitution ke safeguards ka matlab hoga ki koi bhi government ya authority woh koi bhi action nahin kar sakta jo Constitution ke principles ke khilaaf hai. Yeh doctrine aapke liye applica

Yeh topic bahut achcha hai! But, kya main aapse na keh du ki yeh article Hindustan ki family laws ko bahut upar se dekhegi hai. Kya aapko pata hai ki kuchh mahilaon ko court mein apne haq ki raakhri ladaan ke liye paanch se adhik sal lagt

Haan, Section 33A ka concept to bahut confusing hai! Main aapke saath agree hoon ki maternity leave aapke career ko impact karta hai. Lekin, agar yeh section sahi tarike se implement hota, to yeh aapke career ko bhi support karta. Maine koi

Bhai, ab to samajh aaya hai ki Pledge aur Bailment mein kya difference hai. Dono hi transactions hain, lekin ek mein ownership rakhne wala hota hai (Pledge) aur doosre mein nahi, bas possession (Bailment). Ab tu ek example le aur khud samaj

Yaar, let's not get too carried away with the drama of family law. Main to samajhta hoon ki yeh article kuch vajahon se confusing ho sakte hai, jaise ki family law ki kathin aadaten, ya case law ki jatilta. Main suggest karta hoon ki aap sa

Bro, main aapke baare mein na khete hain, lekin yeh tips bahut general hain. CLAT criminal law aur IPC ke questions ke liye practice karna aur concepts samajhne se hi nahi, pariksha paper ki reading speed aur strategy bhi zaroori hai. Aapko

Sir ji, aapke point par sawal hai. Implied contract aur Implied-in-Fact contract dono hi contract hain, lekin difference itni hai. Implied contract woh contract hai jisme shabd nahi ho, lekin intention hota hai. Implied-in-Fact contract woh

Arre, tum aapke article mein yeh soch rahi ho ki torts dono parties ke beech hai, lekin yeh kewal nahi hai. Tort kisi bhi vahan ke through ho sakta hai, jaise ki contract, property ka violation ya jo kuch bhi ho. Agar aapke article mein yeh