Main toh lagta hoon ki ye book ka topic aisa hai jo bohot complex hai. Law of Torts India mein hamesha kai disputes ke centre banta hai, lekin book mein ye samasyaen nahi hi achi tarah se discuss ki gai. Mujhse varta hai ki ye book mein kuc

MCQ ka kutna, ek samasya nahin hai, bas prakriya ka samajhna zaroori hai. Aapko prashn padhke pata chalega ki kya chahiye, phir aapko kahaan se utarna hoga. Main aapko suggest karta hoon ki aap MCQs ko koshish karo aur padhne ke baad practi

"Khush hai yeh sawaal aapne utteer kiya! Ab Section 306 aur 304 Part II dono hi IPC k under aa rahe hain. 306 Biala Murder wala case vishesh roop se Abhay Nath vs State of UP ka hai, jahan Court ne abhyutthan ke liye prashna uthaya tha.

Bhai, I completely agree with the author that the mens rea myth in Indian law needs to be debunked. In my opinion, the Bachawat case (BNS) sets a precedent for a more nuanced understanding of intent, but its application in the IPC is still

Agar aapke paas yeh article hai, to mujhe lagta hai ki BNSS ka reference kyun hai? Yeh legislation bahut prachin hai, aur main samajhta nahi ki ye amendment update ke saath kaise juda hua hai. Kya aap kisi aur tareeke se soch rahe the? Chal

Bhai, don't lose hope. Exam se koi nahi ghabraye wala hai. Yeh hamesha kuch alag hi kirdar mein hai. Humne bhi dekha hai ki 10-15 din me bahut kuch badalta hai. Tumhaari mehnat, humein bhi dekh rahi hai. Apni strategy badalne ke liye 2-3 di