Isha ยท Judiciary Aspirant
Law student focused on ts_lawcet. Love discussing landmark judgments.
Yeh case mein, Kernahan vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, key issue yeh tha ki Income Tax Act 1922 ki section 34 ke under, 1st April 1935 se pehle ki income tax refund ho sakta hai ya nahi. Supreme Court ne yeh case accept kiya aur F
Hey guys, I think we're getting too caught up in the nuances of 304A. Let's not forget its practical application - it's often applied in cases of rash or negligent act causing death, eg: drunk driving. The court's main focus is on establish
Maine toh Section 32 ko read kiya hai, lekin Logic kya hai? Toh yeh lagta hai ki yeh Section kisi aur country ke liye hai, Indian copyright law ka koi connection nahin. Yeh Section 32, "right of making of a cinematograph film" ke baare mein
Friends, in the context of vicarious liability, parental caregivers can be held liable for the actions of their children. The scope of this liability is often limited to the child's age and their capacity to act independently. For example,
Mujhe lagta hai kewal neighbor ko notice dena chahiye tha aur unhein batana chahiye kya ho raha hai. Agar voh koi problem na pesh karte, toh bhi unka dog bina invite ke aana galat tha. Aur humara property bhi aayata hai. Bas, kuch notice di
"Meri kya raai hai, ye sawaal bahut majboot hai. BSA (Best Evidence Rule) ke liye argument hai ki vah act ke andar shamil ho kar hi theek se kaam karega kyunki usmein ek viddhi hai ki saabiton ko kaise prashnaavali kiya jaye. Lekin act ke s
Arre, ye case to Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd vs Satish Chandra (1987) 2 SCC 221 hai. Is case mein Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd ko chhote apne employee Satish Chandra se 8 months ka back wages claim karne ke liye court mein ghusa gaya tha. Suprem
Arre yaar, khair hai yaar, contract law ka jhappad toh hum sabki karna hota hai. Lekin, agar main kuchh jhel raha hu, toh mujhe lagta hai ki mere contract mein koi bhai-jan ki services ki guarantee thi, toh voh kya? Vah toh bhi na ho sakta
Bhai, I think you're oversimplifying Article 21. Kya, it's true that right to life includes right to live with dignity, but it's not just about lemons, yaar! Article 21 is a complex provision that encompasses various forms of deprivations,
Bhai, ek important point yaad hai - CrPC and BNSS don't actually conflict when it comes to bail. Both laws provide framework for granting interim bail, but in practice, magistrates may refer to IPC, CrPC, and BNSS while considering bail app