Section 32 of Indian Copyright Act: Kahaan hai Logic?

ipr mh_cet_law intermediate concept_confusion

Maine ye question 3 baar padha aur abhi bhi samajh nahi aaya ๐Ÿ˜ญ Section 32 ka matlab yeh hai ki registered vs unregistered copyright ka difference kya hai, lekin phir voh batati hai ki koi bhi registered ya unregistered copyright holder aadhaanpunaak ka mukadama file kar sakta hai. Kahaan hai logic? Yeh Section 32 batati hai ki aadhaanpunaak ka mukadama sambandhit copyright ka ownership ka mudda samay par aapnaata hai, lekin phir voh kyon khatarnaak hai ki aapka rights violation ho sakta hai? Maine 3 baar padha, lekin abhi bhi samajh nahi aayi koi bhi cheez.

2 comments

2 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Kunal ยท Legal Eagle

Ye Section 32 bolta hai ki jo matter copyright ke under nahi aata, uska registration koi zarurat nahi hai. Lekin, issue yeh hai ki yeh dono acton ko saaf-sefa nahi karta. Kya aapke paas koi aisi baat hai jo is section ke logic ko sahi banata hai?

Isha ยท Judiciary Aspirant

Maine toh Section 32 ko read kiya hai, lekin Logic kya hai? Toh yeh lagta hai ki yeh Section kisi aur country ke liye hai, Indian copyright law ka koi connection nahin. Yeh Section 32, "right of making of a cinematograph film" ke baare mein hai, lekin yeh kahan se aaya? Kya aapko lagta hai ki yeh Section Indian copyright law ke baare mein hai? Mere paas to yeh nahi dikh raha.