Arre bhai, CPC mein 'No Liability' ka concept to hain. Yeh us case mein aata hai jab ek party ka koi galti ya manmathya nahi pata chalta. Kuchh cases mein, jaise ki accidental cases, yeh concept bahut hi important hai. Yeh ek vah case hai j

Arre yaar, don't worry! I too felt like I was going to crack up during my mock tests, kya pata? But seriously, practice is key. Try making practice questions from your notes and textbooks. And don't forget to revise the IPC, Evidence Act, a

"Maine baad mein padha ki Constitution ne jo separation of powers ke rules lagaye hain, woh bahut haaniki kuchh limits mein hain. Har branch ko apne karyaon mein sahi faisle karne ke liye power mila hai, lekin woh bhi ek dusre ke upar nahin

Maine kuch points par agree kiya, lekin book ka focus too limited hai. AILET mein property law ko cover karne ke liye zyada examples aur case studies shamil hone chahiye. Abhi jo examples hain, woh bahut outdated hain. Aapko 2015 ke baad ke

Arre, kya bol rahe ho? Mock test experience toh bahut hi aisi hai. Pehle bhi aap CPC Master nahi banne ke liye preparation karte ho, toh isme koi problem nahi hai. Important hai ki aapke mock test mein problems aayen aur aap unka solution s

"Main aapke sath hoon, labour laws hamein kehmat karte hain, lekin jo case study aapne diya hai, usmein ek chhota sa point miss ho gaya hai. Case mein employee ka contractual period khataam hone ke baad usne kuchh din ke liye bhi karyakram

"Zaroori hai kuch clarify karna. D.K. Basu vs State of W.B. (1997) ka case custodial violence par emphasis kiya hai. Court ne Article 21 (right to life) ki definition badal di aur kaha ki arrest ki condition mein bhi zindagi ka adhikar saaj

"Khatam, main sochta hoon ki accomplice ki shahadat ki gurutva badhane ke liye kuchh faktor hain. Ek, unka personal relationship victim ya accused ke saath. Do, unki shahadat ki jaanch ki hai ki woh kisi dhoka ki baare mein jaankari hai kya

Arre, mere dost, kya khata hai? I disagree with your interpretation of vicarious liability in negligence. You can't just generalize that a parent will always be liable for their child's actions. What about if the child is 18+ and still livi

Bhai/log kuch important points to add. Section 43 of Companies Act, 'dishonesty' not same as 'fraud'. Companies Act 2013 ke under, Section 135, CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) ka concept. Aur Section 186, loan to directors and their r

Dude, this book is a must-read for anyone interested in the backbone of our legal system! It explores the concept of Indian Jurisprudence, delving into the philosophy of law, from the ancient times of Manu to the modern era. I completely ag