Bhai, IPC aur BSA mein evidence ko consider karne ke tarikhe mein kya difference hai, ismein evidence act ki adhiniyam ki wajah se hi difference hai. Relevancy aur admissibility ke maamle mein IPC 53 mein kaha gaya hai ki pramana kee adhika

Main to yehi kahunga, ejectment suits mein TPA ka koi Twist nahi hain! Section 2(1)(zg) ke under khelne wale contractoron ke liye ek nayi sarkar rule nahi hai. Yeh to bas pre-existing law hai jo abhutpaat mein unke khilaf case chalayen wala

Maine toh phir se sunaa hai kahaan, unwritten promises ko contract mein shamil karne ka faisla. Lekin, yeh sochne mein samarthan nahin kiya jaata ki unhone koi legal liability accept ki hai. Unka sabse bada haazir problem yeh hai ki vah bin

Additional Info: Bhai, ye kahaan se karte hain? Yeh sab kuch CrPC aur BNSS ke beech kyun? Kya aap jaante hain, Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) mein police investigation ki rules aur process hoti hain, while Bombay Nursing Home vs Dr. Laxm

"Aapke thread mein bahut achha shuruat hua hai! Main aapko iske liye shubhkamnayein karta hoon ki aapne is vishay ka gyan prapt karne aur saath mein logon ko vishleshan karne ke liye prerna dete hain. Res judicata aur BSA ki samasyayein bah

Meri opinion hai ki Rylands v Fletcher ki philosophy ke hisaab pure economic loss ke liye bhi liability hona chahiye. Yeh decision to safety valve ke roop mein kaam karti hai. Economic loss aise bhi ho sakta hai jiske liye koi physical dama