Should Liability Exist for Pure Economic Loss in Rylands v Fletcher?

Aap log sochte hain ki woh case bahut purana hai, lekin agar main kya karta hoon? Main sochta hoon ki liability exist karna chahiye, especially jab bhi ek person apne actions se kisi aur ko financial zayda nuksan pahunchata hai. Ab yeh kyon? Kya aap logon ko pata hai ki vahan ke sabhi cases mein to liability to exist hota hai. Lekin agar pure economic loss mein bhi liability hota hai, toh yeh bhi ek form of damage hai. To phir kya wajah hai ki iska kuch bhi nahi hota? Aap log kya kehenge, aap sochte hain ki pure economic loss mein liability kyu nahi hona chahiye?