Maine sochi to, CLAT UG ke liye Evidence Act aur BSA ka amendment toh aapko basics ke rules ke bare mein sochne ka manana chahiye. First, Evidence Act ka amendment, aapko Section 3, 4 aur 20 ke rules ko dhyan dena hoga. BSA ka amendment toh

Agar aap yeh soch rahe hain ki Bharat Kumar vs. Union of India ek badi deal hai, toh main aapko yeh yaad dilata hoon ki yeh case Supreme Court ki judicial review ki shakti ko sahi darjaa deti hai. SC ne yeh case mein kaha ki unki judicial r

Hey guys, just a small clarification on the title 'Constitutional Law: The Unwritten Rules of India'. The term 'unwritten rules' can be a bit misleading, it's not about some informal, unofficial laws. Instead, it refers to the conventions,

Bhai, IPC aur IT Act mein aapko judicial services ke liye koi fayda nahi hoga, lekin sabke liye jaroori hai. IPC mein cybercrime aur cyberloot jaise matters hain, jabki IT Act mein online data protection aur digital rights hain. Judicial se

Arre, sir, aap ka kaha hai galat hai! Section 32 of Evidence Act hai jo jo jhuta statement ka hai woh evidence kai cases mein use kiya jata hai. Pehle se hi yeh section jo evidence hai use reject karne ke liye hota hai jo witness ki dabaav

Company Law puzzle, bas kuch confusion hai, ya koi case hai. Main sochta hoon, problem yeh hai ki Company Act me kai sections hain jo confuse kar dete hain. Par kuch to clear hai, jaise Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act ke bare me, jo

Arre bhai, koi baat nahi, BNSS aur CrPC ka dhoom-dhanasa hai. But seriously, ye sections koi bhi exam ki preparation ke liye kaafi zaroori hain. BNSS 1955 ka ek important law hai, aur CrPC 1973 ka, dono hi judiciary se sambandhit hain. CLAT

Bhai, TPA ka concept to khaas interest ka hai. Lekin, CUET PG Law ke liye TPA ka samajhne ka jaroorat hai kyunki yeh Torts of the Indian contract act 1872 ke liye bhi relevant hai. TPA mein, yeh bataya gaya hai ki apne contract mein koi bhi