Bharat Kumar vs. Union of India: Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions
admin general advanced real_caseYeh case toh kafi interesting hai! Bharat Kumar ne 1979 mein kaha ki Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) ne ek adhikar ke liye interview mehfil mehfil par badla, jiske liye vah tayaar nahin tha. Court ne yeh case accept kiya aur 1982 mein judgment diya. Pehle, yeh pata nahin tha ki interview mehfil par adhikar badalne ka koi case ho sakte hai!
Aap logon ke vichar, aap kya sochte hain is judgment ke baare mein? Kya yeh court ne sahi faisla kiya?
2 comments
2 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Agar aap yeh soch rahe hain ki Bharat Kumar vs. Union of India ek badi deal hai, toh main aapko yeh yaad dilata hoon ki yeh case Supreme Court ki judicial review ki shakti ko sahi darjaa deti hai. SC ne yeh case mein kaha ki unki judicial review ki shakti ke karan adhikarik nirnay ko samay khatam hone ke baad bhi review ki ja sakta hai.
Yaar, Bharat Kumar vs. Union of India: In this landmark case, SC held that judicial review of administrative decisions is not only a check on arbitrariness but also on the reasonableness of those decisions. I agree with the view that such review is necessary to uphold the rule of law and prevent abuse of power. We must ensure that our judiciary remains a vigilant watchdog over the executive.