Khudiram vs State of Bihar (1942)
This landmark case is a classic example of Section 197 CrPC. Back then, the State of Bihar prosecuted Khudiram Bose for waging war against the state. But Khudiram's lawyer argued t…
Hindu Marriage Act: A Judicial Interpretation - Shantaben vs. Somabhai
Shantaben vs. Somabhai (1979) - A landmark judgment where the Supreme Court held that a Hindu marriage registered under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 can be dissolved by an unregist…
Burman's Brew vs. Bajaj: A Brew-tal Judgment
Remember that time Burman's Brew sued Bajaj for using their logo? No, it was 1993, and Bajaj's bike's logo looked suspiciously like Burman's soft drink's logo. The Supreme Court sa…
Bombay High Court v. CIT
Yeh toh kya hua? Kuchh saalon pehle aisa khanjar tha, lekin ab yeh dhyaan mein aya hai. Bombay High Court ka 2006 mein ek faisla aaya tha, jab bench ne kaaha ki 'donations to a uni…
Khan & Anr. v. State of Bihar (1980)
Yeh judgment bahut important hai for CrPC aur BNSS ke study ke liye. Supreme Court ne is case mein kaha tha ki police ko arrest karne ke liye kuch specific reasons ke sath hi apne …
Contract Act ka Pata Chala: Commissioner of Income-tax vs. L. Chandra Sekhar
Maine socha tha I understand Contract, and then the paper happened 💀. Ab aapko batao, main toh hoon contract aur income tax dono mein failed. Par aaj main hoon income tax ke landma…
Mittal v UOI: Busting the myth of 'no work, no pay'
In 1983, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v Deolalikar (1984), but the key decision was made in 1981, in a case …
Lakshmi Kant case - kya aapko iski sabhyata pasand hai?
So, Lakshmi Kant Tiwari vs Dr. Mahanteshware case 1954, yeh kya baat hai ki koi to nahi jaanta. Is case mein, apne biwi ko chhodne ke baad ek mahant ne apni sasurali par apna haq c…
Re: Supreme Court vs Union of India (1970) - the classic 'Six-Judge Bench Sacking Case'
So, in 1970, SC ruled that the president can sack a judge just like that, without assigning reasons. Now, can you imagine if our cricket team selectors could do the same to Rohit S…
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)
The Supreme Court of India made a landmark judgment in 2017, declaring the Right to Privacy a fundamental right under the Constitution. This case revolves around the Aadhaar Act, 2…
Reg versus Habeas Corpus Ad-Subjiciendum
So we studied this case for AILET and I'm still stuck on it 🙄. It's like 'ye section sapne mein aata hai ab' (this section comes only in dream now). 'Reg vs Habeas Corpus Ad-Subjic…
Battling the M'nt of Sanity: A Case Study of Kanhaiya Lal vs Raj Kumar
In 1967, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in Kanhaiya Lal's case (AIR 1967 SC 194). Lal, a 65-year-old retired school teacher, was accused of murdering his 18-year-o…
Damages for Loss of Chances in Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)
Donoghue v Stevenson (1932 AC 562) ko main to bahut samajh ke liye 3 bar padha hai. Iss case mein, Lady Chocolat ki bottle se ghanta aaya aur uski ladki ki mareezii ho gayi. SC ne …
The Tandon vs Kuldip Chand Bhatia Judgment: A Turning Point in Tenancy Law
Aap sab jaante hain ki property law mein tenancy ki baat karni hai toh Tandon vs Kuldip Chand Bhatia ke judgment ka dhyaan dena hoga. Iss ke baad, TPA mein tenant protection ke liy…
Shreya Singh v State of Maharashtra (2012)
This 2012 landmark case saw the Bombay High Court ruling that an MMS clip of a minor girl, shared on a mobile phone, was an "electronic record" under the IT Act. The court said tha…
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
Yaar, remember this one, case law ke baad sab kuch chalta hai! So, main point yeh tha ki Constitution ke basic structure ko touch nahin karna chahta tha. Parliament ki power badhne…
Kesavananda Bharati v Union of India (1973)
This landmark case is a must-know for AILET. It's a judgment that has been interpreted in various ways, but essentially it's about the limits of Parliament's power under Article 36…
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act vs. Pushpa, 1980: A Landmark Ruling
Ye sab yad hain, TS LAWCET ko padhne waale students ko Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 ka basic understanding hoga. Lekin kya aap jaante hain ki Pushpa vs. State of Haryan…
Punjab Police vs Dharmu Ram: Section 174 CrPC - Right to be Produced before Magistrate within 24 hours?
Ye saala case to students ko bahut pasand aata hai, especially abhi preparation ke samay. Ye 1996 mein Punjab and Haryana High Court ka case tha, jahan DSP ko FIR registr karti sam…
Lalita Kumari vs Govt of UP (2014) : Kya Judiciary Ko Suggest Karne Ka Adhikar Hai?
Lalita Kumari vs Govt of UP (2014) ek bahut hi mahatvapurn mudda, jurisprudence ke liye, hai. Unhone isey dikhaaya ki police ko FIR karne ke liye sunvayi kee zaroorat hai. Case mei…