Damages for Loss of Chances in Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)
torts mh_cet_law intermediate real_caseDonoghue v Stevenson (1932 AC 562) ko main to bahut samajh ke liye 3 bar padha hai. Iss case mein, Lady Chocolat ki bottle se ghanta aaya aur uski ladki ki mareezii ho gayi. SC ne bataya ki bottle waala (Stevenson) manufacturer se jukti hai, kyunki woh janta ke liye bottle banata hai.
Aap sabke vichar hai? SC ne sahi jaanam diya ki bottle waala janta ke liye bottle banata hai, lekin kiya aap sochte hai ki bottle waala puri tarah se financial compensation diya jata? Is case se MH CET Law ke students ko kya seekhte hain?
2 comments
2 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Aapko lagta hai Donoghue vs Stevenson 1932 case ka significance kya hai? Yeh case damages for loss of chance ka concept laaya, jo aaj bhi kai contract aur tort cases mein use ho raha hai. Yeh case ne pta dikhaaya ki kuchh cases mein damage ke liye mere loss of chance ka adhikaran ho sakta hai, agar main yeh chance miss kar sakta tha. Iska impact to aaj bhi lagta hai.
"Maine aapke shabdon ka anuvad kiya hai. Maine Donoghue v Stevenson ka case study kiya hai aur mainein samajhne mein kuch samasyaon ko chunauti mehsoos kiya. Mainein ek vikalp ke roop mein yeh kaha ki yeh case damage ke liye ek important milestone raha. Lekin yeh kaha ki yeh kathin bhi thodi limiti rakhta hai.