Article 371J ko lagbhag sabse badi galti ke roop mein dekha jaata hai. Lekin, yeh kaafi samasya hain. Article 371J ka uddeshy Nagaland ke logon ko special treatment deinna tha, jaise ki unko koi bhi central legislation ko accept nahi karna

Fundamental Rights aur Directive Principles mein ek mahatvapoorn difference hai. Fundamental Rights kuchh vishisht adhikaron ka samuh hai jo sabhi nagrikon ko nishchit karte hain, jaise free speech, equality aur freedom of religion. Lekin,

Arre, ek baat yaad aai, kuch logon ki zubani ka khyaal nahi karte, woh toh keh rahe hain ki hum Indian law mein torts ki paribhasha ka upyog karte hain, lekin English law mein bhi use hain, par ant mein hum Indian law mein torts ki paribhas

Bhai, main toh agree hoon that Constitution ko modernize karne ke liye amendment zaroori hai. Lekin, hamare yahaan pe sabse badi chunauti ye hai ki amendments ko aise hi naya framework nahi banane do, jisse sabhi logon ka adhikar sanrakshit

Bhai abetment toh ek bahut hi serious offence hai. Abetment wala log jo bhi karte hain, voh unki karne wali cheezon ki wajah banti hain. Jab log kisi ghatna ko promote ya encourage karte hain, toh voh abetment ka shikar hote hain. Jaise, ag

Main toh agree hoon ki CrPC aur Indian Evidence Act ki amendments bahut zaroori hain. Iske liye humein ek strong legislative framework aur efficient court systems ki zaroorat hai. Lekin, main feel karata hoon ki humein iske alaawa system me

Aapke point ko main nahi man raha hoon (I don't agree with your point). Yeh to sach hai ki Section 307 IPC ek khatarnaak khandaan hai, lekin kuchh judwa ke liye apni apni tarah ke vichar hain. Mere vichar hai ki Section 307 IPC mein 'intent

"Aapki khub mushkil ho rahi hai, but don't worry, main aapko bata sakta hoon ki Evidence Act isse aapki pahal nahi ho sakti! Yeh ek bahut hi zaroori topic hai, lekin agar aap isse sahi tarike se tai yah sakte hain, to aapki score mein bahut

CrPC 468's limitation period is often misunderstood. It's not just about 90 days for lodging an FIR. The key lies in the 'accused person absconding' part. If the accused is on the run, the clock doesn't start ticking. But if they're in cust

Bhai, main to completely agree. Judiciary mein tax exemption ka issue bahut hi sensitive hai. Judiciary ko independent hone ke liye ek secure aur transparent environment chahiye. Taxation ka prabhav inki decision making power par pada sakta

Arre bhai, abhi to hum kya kuchh jaante hain? Family law mooting, yeh to complex topic hai. Jab mein apne first mooting mein participate kiya tha, toh maine bhi same problem face kiya tha, but ab maine samajh liya hai ki preparation toh bah

Main aapko yeh saabit karne ke liye haan hai ki yeh case right to silence par bahut achha nahi hai. Yeh case bolta hai ki agar kisi ko pata hota hai ki uske khilaf evidence mil sakta hai, toh uska right to silence hata jayega. Yeh bahut zya

"Bhai, don't worry, main hoon tumhare sath. Custody battles ka time sabse zyada challenging hota hai, lekin tumhare adhikar ke liye ladna hoga. Apni jaankari ko behtar banayein, aur court mein apni baat kushaan karne ke liye taiyyar ho jane

Arre, ye discussion bahut interesting hai! Contract Law ke paas ke power ko unlock karne ke liye, hamen court decisions ka dhyan rakhna hoga. Aap sabhi ne Bharat ka landmark case, Shriram Finance Ltd. v. Rajesh Kumar (2020), padha hai? Iska

Meh bohot accha topic hai! Risk v riskiness aur recklessness ko IPC mein kaunse se differentiate kiya jaata hai, yeh bahut hi zarruri hai. Sambandhit sections 304-A aur 326 v 307 kaha ke dekhna hoga. Agar aapko yeh subject bahut confusing l