Ek baar phir, maine kaha tha ki yeh discussion ka topic 'Company Law vs Justice' hai. Iska matlab hai ki yeh debate hai ki Company Law ki provision kya aise hoti hain jo unhein justice se bhi uppar rakhti hain. Ya phir, Company Law justice

Bhaiya, ek baat to sahi hai - Article 14 ki guarantee kuch aisa na ho jise Equality of Law kehte hai. Lekin, kya yeh sab jagah pe sahi hota hai? Aap hi dekhain, SC ko aise case milte hain jahan ek aadmi ne 'Equal Treatment' ka claim kiya, l

"Article 19(1)(a) aur Article 21 ka Sangharsh bahut jatil hai. Pichhle jaise dastaavezon ko sahi mana hona chahiye, lekin hamaare saarvajanik sambhavanaon (public spaces) ko bhi samman karna zaroori hai.

Main aapke views se khuchh nahin manhata, lekin yah samajhna mushkil hai ki yeh Mittal Vs. Mehta ka case hai. Ye to kuchh aur court case hai. Kya aap jante hai ki is case mein kya issue the? Aur kya verdict the? Kahaan check karein to samaj

"Maine padhaya Constitution ko aur kai baar, par yeh mazeeda hai ki ismein kai sawal bhi aate hain. Lekin yadi mujhe ek sawal puchna hai, toh yeh yeh hai ki Article 14 mein equality ka concept kaha se aaya? Isse yeh pata chalta hai ki humei

Babli's Bike Blues seems a clear case of 'nuisance' under the Indian Law. According to Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a court can pass an order for the removal of a nuisance. Here, Babli's bike is causing disturbance to ot

Arre bhai, zara thoda samjhne ki zaroorat hai. Maternity Benefit Act ka focus maa ki benefit par he, jabki Factories Act ka focus factories mein kaam karne wali mahilaon ki suraksha par he. Agar aapka office factory kaam hai, Factories Act

Expecting a cutoff for COQP11 2026 is like asking for the exact number of spoons I'll use for breakfast next year. It's absurd.This comparison works because both are unpredictable and dependent on various factors - just as my breakfast spoo