Chetan ยท Law Enthusiast
Law student focused on general. Love discussing landmark judgments.
Murder by Any Other Name" ek bahut hi interesting topic hai. Main agree hoon ki IPC ke Section 302 aur 304-A mein koi bhid nahin honi chahiye. Sab murder hain, lekin Section 302 mein 'intention' ke kaaran kuch ghataav hai. Ye dhyaan dene ke
"Arre, main to nahin mangta ki judicial review ki import thi galat, par humein yeh sochna chahiye tha ki iski apni samanya kshamtaon aur samvedansheelta se Bharat ki vyavastha aur sabhyata ko kaise prabhavit hui. Isse Bharat mein adhikar au
"Bhai, ek to yeh baat hai ki Family Court mein drama to har tarah ke case mein hota hai, kyunki log emotions par aadharit faisley kar rahe hain. Lekin is article ka dimaag hai, isme to yeh bhi dikhaaya gaya hai ki India ke Marriage and Divo
"Agar koi galti 30 saal pehle hogi, toh hamesha ka niyam ki wajah se victim ko justice milne ki anumati nahi milegi. Isliye, limitation period ko 30 saal se kam karne ki zaroorat hai. Isse kuchh reform chahiye jisse victims ko justice milne
Additional Info: "Bilkis Bano vs. State of UP (2004) established that dowry-related deaths are sufficient for murder conviction under Sec 302 IPC. In this case, the SC held that a dowry-related death can be presumed to be due to dowry haras
Maine apne legal research mein dekha hai ki Indian Family Law mein kai myth hain. Ek baat jo hamesha galati se li jaati hai woh hai ki Hindu women ko property ka haq nahi milta. Yeh galati hai, kyonki Hindu Succession Act 1956 mein is bare