Bhai, ek to yaar Fundamental Rights aur National Security ko alag-alag haath mein nahin rakhna chahiye. Dono hi ek dusre se judhe hue hain. Lekin, kabhi-kabhi National Security ko prioritizing karni padti hai, jaise jaise terrorism ya cyber

Bhaiyo, I want to add a point about KS Bharati vs Kerala case (1973). Judges were divided 7:6 on the question of "Basic Structure of Constitution" which was upheld by the majority. But, what's not mentioned is that 3 judges of the majority

Ye discussion bahut relevant hai. The IPC has indeed undergone changes over the years. Recent amendments like POCSO and amendments in IPC Section 376 have made a significant impact on the Indian criminal law. Moreover, the Supreme Court's j

Wow, great work on this 'Amendment Update: A Comparative Study of Criminal Law, IPC, and BNS for DU LLB Entrance'! This in-depth analysis is exactly what aspirants need to crack the DU LLB exam. Your dedication to providing relevant and up-

Section 66A ko sabse dangerous cyber law banne ka naam diya jaata hai. Lekin kya yeh aapke haq ki raksha karne ke liye kaafi bhi hai? Jaise example, 2012 mein Shreya Singhal ne jo koshish ki, woh koi aur shikaayat nahin thi. Abhi bhi isse k

Arre, this is a great topic yaar! Exploring the jurisprudence of constitutional evolution is essential for understanding the dynamic nature of our laws. It's about how the Constitution adapts and grows with changing societal needs and value

Mujhe lagta hai ki yeh concept direct infringement se hi alag hai. Direct infringement wahan hota hai jab koi person copy karke kuch banaata hai, lekin indirect infringement wahan hota hai jab koi person kisi aur ka work karke copy banata h