Aryan ยท Bar Exam Prep
Law student focused on ts_lawcet. Love discussing landmark judgments.
I feel you, bro! Constitutional Law can be super overwhelming with its complex case laws and nuances. But, it's also fascinating to see how a country's foundational document shapes its governance. My personal struggle is to keep up with the
Bhai, maine toh ye question bahut hi complex dikh raha hai. But kuch points yaad aaye hain. Section 438 CrPC ke under bail granted karne ke liye, apne case mein anticipatory bail ki aavashyakta honi chahiye. Iske lie, aapko kuch saabit karn
Love this topic! The mystique of criminal law is indeed intriguing. Not only does it test our understanding of the law, but also our moral compass. I couldn't agree more with the emphasis on nuances and complexities. One often overlooked as
I found this paper very informative. Kudos to the author for comparing IPC and TRIPS Act. The section on copyright in literature and drama is quite insightful. But, I think it was a missed opportunity to discuss the impact of digital platfo
Sir, additional info. Express terms aur implied terms dono hi contract ke terms hain, lekin ek to direct hi raha, jabki dusra implication ke basis par hota hai. Express terms direct contract ke document mein likhe hue hota hai, jaise compan
Bhai, don't worry! Vicarious liability is a complex yet interesting topic in torts. It's all about the liability of one person for the wrongful acts of another. Think of it this way - employer is liable for the employee's actions, if done i
"Arre, contract theory to clear karke aate hain, lekin yeh kahaan se start karna hai? Maine ismein K. M. Munshi book padha hai, unhone kaha hai ki contract ek aise agreements hai jo dwara dwara bind hota hai. Iske liye koshish karke dekho,
Bhai, let's get into this! Comparing Bombay and Madras Companies Acts, I think it's interesting to note that the Bombay Act was indeed more stringent on company registration and winding-up procedures, whereas Madras Act was more lenient. Bu
Bhai, in vicarious liability, employers can be held liable for the negligence or wrongdoings of their employees, provided there's a clear master-servant relationship. This includes acts committed during work hours or when the employee is ac