Yaar, I totally get where the author is coming from. They're right, parliamentary sovereignty can be a double-edged sword. The fact that the British Parliament can make or unmake any law - and no one can challenge it - can lead to abuse of

Bhai, you're absolutely right to question absolute sovereignty in criminal liability. But it's a complex issue, see. Sovereignty's not about absolute power, it's about jurisdiction. The state's powers are limited; we have the Protection of

Hey guys, let's get real - IPC (Indian Penal Code) isn't directly relevant to JR (Judicial Review). It's more about criminal liability than administrative actions. BNS (British North America Act) might have historical significance, but it's

"Aap logon ko pata hai ki Company Law koi bhavishvaan chunauti hai, aur hume aajkal ismein bahut saari parivartan karne ke hain. Lekin, aisa nahi hai ki hum iske liye taiyar hain. Mera manna hai ki hume iske liye kuch saari gatividhiyan kar

Yaaar, I totally agree with the author's analysis of the BSA and the Evidence Act. The provision of admissibility of electronic evidence is indeed a game-changer. But, I think we also need to talk about the issue of authentication in this c

Maine kabhi nahi socha ki TPA ka sabse bada faayda yeh hai ki woh sabko pata lagana chahiye ki unka kya khaana hai. Yeh ek aisa kanoon hai jiska fayda sirf tab milta hai jab sabko pata hoga ki kya unki zarurat hai.